The descriptors will stay. All of the abstract interfaces related to
services -- Service, RpcChannel, RpcController, etc. -- will be deprecated.
New RPC systems will be able to use code generator plugins to inject code
specific to them into what protoc generates.
If you are going to provide a pr
On 11/23/2009 06:27 PM, Kenton Varda wrote:
> If you want something that's likely to work with other languages, I'd
> just implement RPC over HTTP. Assuming you have HTTP support in R
> already it should be pretty straightforward. Otherwise you'll have to
> look very carefully at the third-party
the actual messages as a bytes field.
Romain
-Original Message-
From: Kenton Varda
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 09:27:59
To: Romain François
Cc: Protocol Buffers
Subject: Re: [protobuf] comparison of rpc implementations
If you want something that's likely to work with other languages, I&#
If you want something that's likely to work with other languages, I'd just
implement RPC over HTTP. Assuming you have HTTP support in R already it
should be pretty straightforward. Otherwise you'll have to look very
carefully at the third-party RPC implementations to figure out which ones
are wel
Hello,
Is there a comparison of the various rpc implementations somewhere ?
We are implementing third party support for R and would like to throw an
rpc implementation into the mix, but which one to choose ?
Romain
--
Romain Francois
Professional R Enthusiast
+33(0) 6 28 91 30 30
http://romai
