Cool. I think this makes sense as I could use GZIPInputStream with
mergeFrom() and parseFrom().
On Oct 21, 4:20 pm, "Kenton Varda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is no built-in support for this, but there's nothing stopping you from
> applying whatever compression you want to the serialized d
It /might/ work (especially if there are a lot of repeated strings) -
but from my own tests, "compressing" pb-serialized data actually made
it bigger (always a good sign for a dense format). Quite possibly
Google have seen better results, but it doesn't work for me...
Marc
--~--~-~--~
There is no built-in support for this, but there's nothing stopping you from
applying whatever compression you want to the serialized data.
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 1:08 PM, GDR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I noticed the protocol buffers store strings in their uncompressed
> form. Is there any p
I noticed the protocol buffers store strings in their uncompressed
form. Is there any provision to produce and consume protobufs in
compressed form? This would be specially helpful if a lot of fields
were repeated strings.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this mes
