I can find it but the latest version is 2.5.0 :-(
On Friday, 12 September 2014 13:30:49 UTC+2, Sverre Moe wrote:
>
> I cannot find any Google Protobuf Maven Plugin in the Central Maven
> Repository under com.google.protobuf
>
> kl. 19:10:18 UTC+1 mandag 2. februar 2009 skrev gak følgende:
>>
>> D
I cannot find any Google Protobuf Maven Plugin in the Central Maven
Repository under com.google.protobuf
kl. 19:10:18 UTC+1 mandag 2. februar 2009 skrev gak følgende:
>
> Definitely. Now that I have access this will be done this week.
>
> On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Kenton Varda > wrote:
Hey everybody,
Does the maven plugin has been released yet ?
Le mercredi 18 mars 2009 13:03:24 UTC+1, SilentJ a écrit :
>
> Just in case others are looking for it, the maven plugin has been
> checked in to svn:
>
> http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/source/browse/
>
> You can find it at: branch
Just in case others are looking for it, the maven plugin has been
checked in to svn:
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/source/browse/
You can find it at: branches/maven-plugin/tools/maven-plugin
I haven't used it but will be trying it out soon.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~--
Definitely. Now that I have access this will be done this week.
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Kenton Varda wrote:
> Gregory, could you please at least check in your code to SVN?
>
> On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Brian Erst wrote:
>>
>> Any update on the Maven plug-in? We've had two differ
Gregory, could you please at least check in your code to SVN?
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Brian Erst wrote:
>
> Any update on the Maven plug-in? We've had two different plug-ins that
> have essentially been abandoned waiting for an imminent Google release
> for six months now. I've used vari
Any update on the Maven plug-in? We've had two different plug-ins that
have essentially been abandoned waiting for an imminent Google release
for six months now. I've used various hacks to the POM files, but a
real plug-in would be sweet.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You r
I don't really consider this slacking; anything going to the open source
community is a public gift and should be treated as such. I mostly just
want to avoid fragmentation and having three different plugins doing the
same thing, so that it can be focused and as high-quality as possible. Even
if
I totally understand the frustration. This had slipped to the bottom
of the priorities, but I'm actually working on this stuff today.
Basically, my plan is to check in the plugin today. The plugin is
more or less done, but I have no tests. (ack!) I would really,
really, really appreciate it if
[cc Greg to get his attention]
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 9:35 AM, Nat wrote:
>
> So is this going anywhere? Bueller...? Bueller...?
>
> After my last post I was curious to build my first Maven2 plugin, and
> I also now have a working plugin that binds to the generate-sources
> phase like Tom's o
So is this going anywhere? Bueller...? Bueller...?
After my last post I was curious to build my first Maven2 plugin, and
I also now have a working plugin that binds to the generate-sources
phase like Tom's original post in this thread. I was just about to
(ask to) put it on Codehaus but re-rea
I am also looking for this plugin to be complete (I was thinking of
writing one myself), but here's an example to get you going until it's
finished. I created a directory src/main/protobuf in my maven project
and put a single "test.proto" file in there, and added this to my
pom.xml:
--- snip ---
Is this available yet?
If not, can someone post how to invoke protoc from a more "vanilla"
Java Maven project to generate .java source, using explicit paths or
whatever it takes. I'm a little familiar with Maven, but mostly via
using existing plugins, not adding callouts.
TIA,
djb
On Dec 3 2008
This would indeed be quite useful!
On Dec 4, 11:04 am, Gregory Kick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's the plan.
>
> On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 11:57 AM, Tom Nichols <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thanks Greg, Kent --
>
> > No problem. Actually if you can stick a build in the Maven repo that
> > wo
That's the plan.
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 11:57 AM, Tom Nichols <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks Greg, Kent --
>
> No problem. Actually if you can stick a build in the Maven repo that
> would be super cool too. Then using the plugin would be a simple
> matter of a few lines in a POM.
>
> On We
Thanks Greg, Kent --
No problem. Actually if you can stick a build in the Maven repo that
would be super cool too. Then using the plugin would be a simple
matter of a few lines in a POM.
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 4:02 PM, Gregory Kick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The intertubes have led you to th
The intertubes have led you to the right place. This has actually
been done for a while, but I haven't written the tests (arg!). I'll
definitely get it checked in by the end of the year. Sorry for the
procrastination.
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Kenton Varda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [c
[cc Gregory]
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 8:39 AM, Tom Nichols <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> Has anything become of this? I'm looking for a protobuf compiler
> Maven plugin and this is the only good lead I can find on the
> intertubes.
>
> Thanks.
> -Tom
>
> On Jul 24, 2:36 am, Tom <[EMA
Hi guys,
Has anything become of this? I'm looking for a protobuf compiler
Maven plugin and this is the only good lead I can find on the
intertubes.
Thanks.
-Tom
On Jul 24, 2:36 am, Tom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greg,
>
> That's good news. I'm hoping to see your implementation soon. Can you
19 matches
Mail list logo
