Heh, I remember complaining about this to James when they first
published the byte code spec. It was annoying then and continues to be
annoying today.
On 7/24/09, Kenton Varda wrote:
> How annoying. I'll make sure this or something like it gets into the next
> release -- which I'm going to try
How annoying. I'll make sure this or something like it gets into the next
release -- which I'm going to try to push next week.
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 8:36 AM, anonymous wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I was not able to compile a Java file generated by protoc 2.10 from a
> rather big .proto file.
> It se
This looks to be a real problem. Kenton's on vacation but should be
back soon (tomorrow I think) so he can take a look at the patch then.
On Jul 22, 8:36 am, anonymous wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was not able to compile a Java file generated by protoc 2.10 from a
> rather big .proto file.
> It seems I
Hello,
I was not able to compile a Java file generated by protoc 2.10 from a
rather big .proto file.
It seems I have hit the upper limit for a Java string literal
(65535???).
I slightly modified src/google/protobuf/compiler/java/java_file.cc so
that static initialization is performed from
an arr
