Re: VOTE: Release Proton 0.9-rc-1 as 0.9 final

2015-03-09 Thread Gordon Sim
On 03/09/2015 06:39 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote: Can you pull this over to the 0.9 branch? Done.

Re: VOTE: Release Proton 0.9-rc-1 as 0.9 final

2015-03-09 Thread Ken Giusti
Done! - Original Message - > From: "Rafael Schloming" > To: proton@qpid.apache.org > Cc: us...@qpid.apache.org > Sent: Monday, March 9, 2015 2:40:18 PM > Subject: Re: VOTE: Release Proton 0.9-rc-1 as 0.9 final > > Can you pull this over to the 0.9 branch? > > --Rafael > > On Mon, Mar

Re: VOTE: Release Proton 0.9-rc-1 as 0.9 final

2015-03-09 Thread Rafael Schloming
FYI, unlike previous releases I've created a 0.9 branch so that work can continue on trunk without impacting the release. Please ensure that any fixes intended for the release actually end up on the 0.9 release branch. --Rafael On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 7:57 AM, Rafael Schloming wrote: > Hi Everyo

Re: VOTE: Release Proton 0.9-rc-1 as 0.9 final

2015-03-09 Thread Rafael Schloming
Can you pull this over to the 0.9 branch? --Rafael On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Gordon Sim wrote: > On 03/09/2015 02:14 PM, Ken Giusti wrote: > >> Additionally, the following python unit tests fail unless the openssl >> libraries are installed: >> >> proton_tests.engine.ServerTest.testIdleT

Re: VOTE: Release Proton 0.9-rc-1 as 0.9 final

2015-03-09 Thread Rafael Schloming
Can you pull this over to the 0.9 branch? --Rafael On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Ken Giusti wrote: > FWIW: pushed a fix to these doc errors: > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=qpid-proton.git;a=commit;h=bc2b630eb969710b04a861797567ab2dc368020a > > > > > - Original Message --

Re: VOTE: Release Proton 0.9-rc-1 as 0.9 final

2015-03-09 Thread Ken Giusti
FWIW: pushed a fix to these doc errors: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=qpid-proton.git;a=commit;h=bc2b630eb969710b04a861797567ab2dc368020a - Original Message - > From: "Ken Giusti" > To: us...@qpid.apache.org > Cc: proton@qpid.apache.org > Sent: Monday, March 9, 2015 9:13:

Re: 0.9 release schedule

2015-03-09 Thread Alan Conway
On Mon, 2015-03-09 at 06:56 -0400, Rafael Schloming wrote: > Ok, I'll push out a 0.9 RC ASAP. > > On the general topic of API stability, I think the key measure of > "stability" that I would personally like to see (be it 0.9 or 0.10) is not > that we somehow freeze APIs and guarantee to never chan

Re: VOTE: Release Proton 0.9-rc-1 as 0.9 final

2015-03-09 Thread Alan Conway
I've tested this against dispatch trunk and 0.4 branch with no problems, so this looks good to me apart from the SSL issue mentioned below. On Mon, 2015-03-09 at 14:39 +, Gordon Sim wrote: > On 03/09/2015 02:14 PM, Ken Giusti wrote: > > Additionally, the following python unit tests fail unless

Re: VOTE: Release Proton 0.9-rc-1 as 0.9 final

2015-03-09 Thread Alan Conway
On Mon, 2015-03-09 at 09:13 -0400, Ken Giusti wrote: > Anyone else getting the following errors when building the docs? > > > ;; This buffer is for notes you don't want to save, and for Lisp evaluation. > ;; If you want to create a file, visit that file with C-x C-f, > ;; then enter the text in t

Re: 0.9 release schedule

2015-03-09 Thread Ken Giusti
- Original Message - > From: "Rafael Schloming" > To: proton@qpid.apache.org > Cc: us...@qpid.apache.org > Sent: Monday, March 9, 2015 6:56:49 AM > Subject: Re: 0.9 release schedule > > Ok, I'll push out a 0.9 RC ASAP. > > On the general topic of API stability, I think the key measure

Re: VOTE: Release Proton 0.9-rc-1 as 0.9 final

2015-03-09 Thread Gordon Sim
On 03/09/2015 02:14 PM, Ken Giusti wrote: Additionally, the following python unit tests fail unless the openssl libraries are installed: proton_tests.engine.ServerTest.testIdleTimeout proton_tests.engine.ServerTest.testKeepalive proton_tests.messenger.IdleTimeoutTest.testIdleTimeout proton_test

Re: VOTE: Release Proton 0.9-rc-1 as 0.9 final

2015-03-09 Thread Ken Giusti
Additionally, the following python unit tests fail unless the openssl libraries are installed: proton_tests.engine.ServerTest.testIdleTimeout proton_tests.engine.ServerTest.testKeepalive proton_tests.messenger.IdleTimeoutTest.testIdleTimeout proton_tests.utils.SyncRequestResponseTest.test_request

Re: VOTE: Release Proton 0.9-rc-1 as 0.9 final

2015-03-09 Thread Darryl L. Pierce
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 09:13:07AM -0400, Ken Giusti wrote: > Anyone else getting the following errors when building the docs? > > > ;; This buffer is for notes you don't want to save, and for Lisp evaluation. > ;; If you want to create a file, visit that file with C-x C-f, > ;; then enter the te

Re: Proton and Ruby object references...

2015-03-09 Thread Darryl L. Pierce
On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 04:41:34PM -0500, Darryl L. Pierce wrote: > Revisiting this topic given newly discovered issues: Thinking about this over the weekend, it feels like it would be a huge nightmare to try and put a shim in place to keep a Ruby object held by a C struct from being reaped. Espe

Re: VOTE: Release Proton 0.9-rc-1 as 0.9 final

2015-03-09 Thread Ken Giusti
Anyone else getting the following errors when building the docs? ;; This buffer is for notes you don't want to save, and for Lisp evaluation. ;; If you want to create a file, visit that file with C-x C-f, ;; then enter the text in that file's own buffer. Generating example index... finalizing in

VOTE: Release Proton 0.9-rc-1 as 0.9 final

2015-03-09 Thread Rafael Schloming
Hi Everyone, I've posted 0.9-rc-1 in the usual places. Please have a look and register your vote: Source code can be found here: http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.9-rc-1/ Java binaries are here: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-1025 [ ] Yes,

Re: 0.9 release schedule

2015-03-09 Thread Rafael Schloming
Ok, I'll push out a 0.9 RC ASAP. On the general topic of API stability, I think the key measure of "stability" that I would personally like to see (be it 0.9 or 0.10) is not that we somehow freeze APIs and guarantee to never change them, but rather that we change them in ways that are backwards co