On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 6:16 AM, Dominic Evans dominic.ev...@uk.ibm.com
wrote:
-Robbie Gemmell robbie.gemm...@gmail.com wrote: -
There were some changes on master and the branch yesterday, so I have
updated the commit lists again. The current categorised list of
commits is now at:
-Robbie Gemmell robbie.gemm...@gmail.com wrote: -
There were some changes on master and the branch yesterday, so I have
updated the commit lists again. The current categorised list of
commits is now at:
http://people.apache.org/~robbie/qpid/proton/0.9.1/git-cherry-pass3-c
There were some changes on master and the branch yesterday, so I have
updated the commit lists again. The current categorised list of
commits is now at:
http://people.apache.org/~robbie/qpid/proton/0.9.1/git-cherry-pass3-categorised.txt
As before, only the commits at the very bottom have been
On 29 April 2015 at 17:38, Gordon Sim g...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/27/2015 01:45 PM, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 04/27/2015 01:14 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote:
I also added PROTON-858 as a release blocker.
I've been trying to get a fix proposal together for that. I'll post it
for review as soon as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14519710#comment-14519710
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on PROTON-490:
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14519709#comment-14519709
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on PROTON-490:
Commit
On 04/27/2015 01:45 PM, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 04/27/2015 01:14 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote:
I also added PROTON-858 as a release blocker.
I've been trying to get a fix proposal together for that. I'll post it
for review as soon as I'm reasonably confident, still seeing some issues
at present
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-873?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Darryl L. Pierce resolved PROTON-873.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 0.10
Convert use of Object.send to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-871?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14520046#comment-14520046
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on PROTON-871:
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-344?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14520048#comment-14520048
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on PROTON-344:
Commit
Well, done enough to consider merging to master.
While the patch is quite large, most of the changes are simple syntax changes
to avoid non-python3 compliant syntax.
The code is available on the kgiusti-python3 branch at the Apache repo.
Hi Everyone,
I've put out an RC for 0.9.1 in the usual places.
Source artifacts are here:
https://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.9.1-rc1/
Java binaries are here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-1033
Please check them out and register your vote:
[
Darryl L. Pierce created PROTON-872:
---
Summary: Ruby Messenger should not use send as it conflicts with
Ruby's Object::send method
Key: PROTON-872
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-872
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Darryl L. Pierce resolved PROTON-872.
-
Resolution: Not A Problem
Ruby doesn't recommend using send, so using that name should
On 04/29/2015 07:15 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:38 PM, Gordon Sim g...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/27/2015 01:45 PM, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 04/27/2015 01:14 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote:
I also added PROTON-858 as a release blocker.
I've been trying to get a fix
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:38 PM, Gordon Sim g...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/27/2015 01:45 PM, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 04/27/2015 01:14 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote:
I also added PROTON-858 as a release blocker.
I've been trying to get a fix proposal together for that. I'll post it
for review as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14519918#comment-14519918
]
Darryl L. Pierce commented on PROTON-872:
-
Very good point. Thanks for the link,
What happens when I run make test and I have both python2 and python3
installed on my system? Do the tests run once under each version or does
one of the versions 'win'?
--Rafael
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 4:05 PM, Ken Giusti kgiu...@redhat.com wrote:
Well, done enough to consider merging to
GitHub user dcristoloveanu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-proton/pull/25
Initial transport frame size 256 bytes
In order to reduce RAM footprint on rather simple scenarios on small
devices the initial transport frame size could be lowered to 256, since the
GitHub user dnwe opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-proton/pull/26
proton-c: minor code fixes
Prevent pn_data_vfill from peeking at memory outside the intended bounds
and fix a few minor -Wextra warnings about incomplete struct initialisation
You can merge this
Github user dnwe commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-proton/pull/26#issuecomment-97600613
https://travis-ci.org/dnwe/qpid-proton/builds/60601702
---
If your project is set up for it, you
21 matches
Mail list logo
