[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-950?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14644850#comment-14644850
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on PROTON-950:
Commit c9
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-950?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14644849#comment-14644849
]
Andrew Stitcher commented on PROTON-950:
Given that the 0.10 version of the Python
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-950?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14644842#comment-14644842
]
Andrew Stitcher edited comment on PROTON-950 at 7/28/15 6:49 PM:
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-950?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14644842#comment-14644842
]
Andrew Stitcher edited comment on PROTON-950 at 7/28/15 6:48 PM:
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-950?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14644842#comment-14644842
]
Andrew Stitcher commented on PROTON-950:
I don't understand - the previous code di
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-950?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14644837#comment-14644837
]
Gordon Sim commented on PROTON-950:
---
It set the chosen mechanism to be plain if a userna
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-950?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14644822#comment-14644822
]
Andrew Stitcher commented on PROTON-950:
Did the 0.9 Python "Reactive" API code se
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-950?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14644813#comment-14644813
]
Gordon Sim commented on PROTON-950:
---
"This can only be a change in behaviour for applica
PROTON-905 reverted.
- Original Message -
> From: "Ken Giusti"
> To: proton@qpid.apache.org
> Cc: d...@qpid.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2015 10:49:20 AM
> Subject: Re: proton 0.10 blocker
>
> Awww crap.
>
> Let's revert the whole thing then. I always felt that 'fix' was more
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-905?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14644751#comment-14644751
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on PROTON-905:
Commit 0f
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-905?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14644749#comment-14644749
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on PROTON-905:
Commit 4c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-905?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14644750#comment-14644750
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on PROTON-905:
Commit 0f
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-905?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14644747#comment-14644747
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on PROTON-905:
Commit 4c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-905?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14644748#comment-14644748
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on PROTON-905:
Commit 4c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-950?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14644675#comment-14644675
]
Andrew Stitcher commented on PROTON-950:
This can only be a change in behaviour fo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-950?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Stitcher updated PROTON-950:
---
Description: In the current 0.10 alpha, if SASL PLAIN is selected, it will
only work if the co
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Stitcher resolved PROTON-960.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 0.10
> On error Proton can send an open and a close
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Stitcher resolved PROTON-959.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 0.10
> On error Proton can send an open and a close
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-963?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Stitcher resolved PROTON-963.
Resolution: Fixed
> [SASL] Raise PN_TRANSPORT_ERROR events with correct condition for
> aut
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-963?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14644491#comment-14644491
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on PROTON-963:
Commit 0d
Awww crap.
Let's revert the whole thing then. I always felt that 'fix' was more voodoo
than science.
IMHO I don't think the original bug should be a blocker for 0.10. IIRC it
isn't a regression, and there's a 'work around' by using proton events.
- Original Message -
> From: "Gordo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-923?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14644471#comment-14644471
]
Andrew Stitcher commented on PROTON-923:
This is the issue for raising the correct
Andrew Stitcher created PROTON-963:
--
Summary: [SASL] Raise PN_TRANSPORT_ERROR events with correct
condition for authentication failure
Key: PROTON-963
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-963
On 07/20/2015 08:53 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote:
I'm fine going ahead with Gordon's fix. I don't have a lot of time to dig
into the refcounting issue personally right now, but I'd at least leave the
bug open until we have made it through a bit more testing. I have an uneasy
feeling it (or somethin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-923?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ken Giusti resolved PROTON-923.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Re-tested with 0.10 Beta1 and concur - the TRANSPORT_ERROR event is now
properly po
On 07/28/2015 10:57 AM, Tomáš Šoltys wrote:
So to make it work it is enough to set idle timeout on both sides and
proton will handle rest?
If an idle timeout is set by the local application, then proton will
raise an error if there is no incoming traffic for that time.
If an idle timeout is
Hi Gordon,
thanks for the answer.
So to make it work it is enough to set idle timeout on both sides and
proton will handle rest?
Is heartbeat being sent by pn_transport_tick() ?
If so in what event it should be sent? In PN_TRANSPORT ?
Regards,
Tomas
2015-07-28 11:01 GMT+02:00 Gordon Sim :
> O
On 07/28/2015 08:17 AM, Tomáš Šoltys wrote:
Hi,
I am looking for a way hot to send a heartbeat. I have found something
about sending an empty frame and pn_transport_set_idle_timeout()
Is this somewhat related? Is there a way how to send/receive heartbeats?
In AMQP 1.0, heartbeats are configur
Hi,
I am looking for a way hot to send a heartbeat. I have found something
about sending an empty frame and pn_transport_set_idle_timeout()
Is this somewhat related? Is there a way how to send/receive heartbeats?
Thanks and regards,
Tomas
29 matches
Mail list logo
