On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 10:38 -0400, Andrew Stitcher wrote:
I like the way you're thinking - I expect to have real time to look
at
your code Tomorrow/Wednesday.
One point that occurred to me over the weekend (that I think is
probably incorporated in what you've done here). Is that C++ code
I like the way you're thinking - I expect to have real time to look at
your code Tomorrow/Wednesday.
One point that occurred to me over the weekend (that I think is
probably incorporated in what you've done here). Is that C++ code never
needs to use a shared_ptr to any Proton struct because
On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 10:38 -0400, Andrew Stitcher wrote:
I like the way you're thinking - I expect to have real time to look
at
your code Tomorrow/Wednesday.
One point that occurred to me over the weekend (that I think is
probably incorporated in what you've done here). Is that C++ code
On 15/08/15 19:14 +0100, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
The Apache Qpid community is pleased to announce the immediate
availability of Apache Qpid Proton 0.10.
Qpid Proton is an AMQP 1.0 messaging library. It can be used in a wide
range of messaging applications including brokers, clients, routers,
I've been doing a lot of thinking about memory management and proton
bindings in 4 languages (C, Go, python and C++) and I have Seen The
Light. Here is a write-up, I'd appreciate feedback in the form of
email, reviewboard diffs, regular diffs, or just commit improvements if
you're a commiter. I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-865?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14700199#comment-14700199
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on PROTON-865:
Commit
On 17 August 2015 at 21:11, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote:
snip
Outsider question:
Is there a reason why 0.10 is used rather than 0.10.0?
I mainly used 0.10 because it was versioned 0.10-SNAPSHOT beforehand
and had already gone through initial alpha/betas as 0.10 before I
started
