Re: All about proton memory management (or C++, python and Go - Oh My!)

On Tue, 2015-08-18 at 12:09 -0400, Andrew Stitcher wrote: > On Tue, 2015-08-18 at 07:38 -0400, Rafael Schloming wrote: > > Nice writeup! > > I agree. > > Andrew > > [Did you make a pass through the doc to ensure that the claimed API > doc > is actually there? that is, doc on ownership and scope

[jira] [Commented] (PROTON-986) [C] proton-dump assumes one AMQP header

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-986?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14701524#comment-14701524 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on PROTON-986: Commit 18

Re: All about proton memory management (or C++, python and Go - Oh My!)

On Tue, 2015-08-18 at 07:38 -0400, Rafael Schloming wrote: > Nice writeup! I agree. Andrew [Did you make a pass through the doc to ensure that the claimed API doc is actually there? that is, doc on ownership and scope?]

[jira] [Created] (PROTON-986) [C] proton-dump assumes one AMQP header

Chuck Rolke created PROTON-986: -- Summary: [C] proton-dump assumes one AMQP header Key: PROTON-986 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-986 Project: Qpid Proton Issue Type: Improveme

[jira] [Created] (PROTON-985) Modify pn_transport_tick to explicitly use a monotonic clock, not wall clock time

Ken Giusti created PROTON-985: - Summary: Modify pn_transport_tick to explicitly use a monotonic clock, not wall clock time Key: PROTON-985 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-985 Project: Qp

[GitHub] qpid-proton pull request: PROTON-984: Document proton-j time units

GitHub user boo opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/qpid-proton/pull/50 PROTON-984: Document proton-j time units Can somebody help me fill out the blanks here? I think proton-j uses milliseconds throughout, and what does Reactor#setTimeout() do? You can merge this

[jira] [Commented] (PROTON-984) Document proton-j time units

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-984?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14701208#comment-14701208 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on PROTON-984: --- GitHub user boo opened a pull request:

[jira] [Created] (PROTON-984) Document proton-j time units

Bozo Dragojevic created PROTON-984: -- Summary: Document proton-j time units Key: PROTON-984 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-984 Project: Qpid Proton Issue Type: Improvement

[jira] [Created] (PROTON-983) Expose Event.copy() to bindings

Bozo Dragojevic created PROTON-983: -- Summary: Expose Event.copy() to bindings Key: PROTON-983 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-983 Project: Qpid Proton Issue Type: Improveme

[jira] [Created] (PROTON-982) Make proton python tests compatible with unittest

Bozo Dragojevic created PROTON-982: -- Summary: Make proton python tests compatible with unittest Key: PROTON-982 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-982 Project: Qpid Proton Iss

[jira] [Created] (PROTON-981) Make JythonTest extendable

Bozo Dragojevic created PROTON-981: -- Summary: Make JythonTest extendable Key: PROTON-981 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-981 Project: Qpid Proton Issue Type: Improvement

[GitHub] qpid-proton pull request: Proton 980

GitHub user boo opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/qpid-proton/pull/49 Proton 980 You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/boo/qpid-proton proton-980 Alternatively you can review and apply these chan

[GitHub] qpid-proton pull request: PROTON-964: Proton-J extensible event ty...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/qpid-proton/pull/48 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[jira] [Commented] (PROTON-964) Proton-J extensible event types

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14701142#comment-14701142 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on PROTON-964: --- Github user asfgit closed the pull request

[jira] [Commented] (PROTON-964) Proton-J extensible event types

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14701140#comment-14701140 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on PROTON-964: Commit 94

[jira] [Created] (PROTON-980) Enable handler processing the event after child handlers have processed it

Bozo Dragojevic created PROTON-980: -- Summary: Enable handler processing the event after child handlers have processed it Key: PROTON-980 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-980 Project:

Re: All about proton memory management (or C++, python and Go - Oh My!)

Nice writeup! --Rafael On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 4:34 PM, aconway wrote: > I've been doing a lot of thinking about memory management and proton > bindings in 4 languages (C, Go, python and C++) and I have Seen The > Light. Here is a write-up, I'd appreciate feedback in the form of > email, review

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Qpid Proton 0.10 released

On 18 August 2015 at 07:48, Flavio Percoco wrote: > On 17/08/15 21:57 +0100, Robbie Gemmell wrote: >> >> On 17 August 2015 at 21:11, Flavio Percoco wrote: > > [snip] >>> >>> Is that something we can change in qpid-proton ? >>> >> >> I'm entirely on board personally with including the extra digit

A case in favor of separate repos for language bindings

Greetings, I'd like to take a chance, now that 0.10 is out, to make a point in favor of using submodules rather than having all bindings in the same repository. I think qpid-proton has reached the point where it's mature enough to have some of the bindings promoted to having their own repos. Mor