Re: [VOTE] 0.3 RC3

2013-01-15 Thread Rafael Schloming
The staging repo has been released, the RCs were copied over to dist last night, and the download page was updated this morning. I've also created a 0.3 branch. --Rafael On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote: > On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 02:14:26PM -0500, Rafael Schloming wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] 0.3 RC3

2013-01-15 Thread Rajith Attapattu
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 2:48 PM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote: > On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 02:35:08PM -0500, Rajith Attapattu wrote: >> Rafi, >> >> We should create tags for the releases. >> Unless I have missed (in which case I apologize), I don't see any for >> 0.1 and 0.2 releases (I do see branches fo

Re: [VOTE] 0.3 RC3

2013-01-14 Thread Darryl L. Pierce
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 02:14:26PM -0500, Rafael Schloming wrote: > +1 from me as well. I think we have enough votes/time to call this one. > I'll post the RC3 as 0.3 shortly. Sorry, thought I'd posted before my +1. -- Darryl L. Pierce, Sr. Software Engineer @ Red Hat, Inc. Delivering value year

Re: [VOTE] 0.3 RC3

2013-01-14 Thread Darryl L. Pierce
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 02:35:08PM -0500, Rajith Attapattu wrote: > Rafi, > > We should create tags for the releases. > Unless I have missed (in which case I apologize), I don't see any for > 0.1 and 0.2 releases (I do see branches for them though). There are branches for the releases, if not tag

Re: [VOTE] 0.3 RC3

2013-01-14 Thread Rajith Attapattu
Rafi, We should create tags for the releases. Unless I have missed (in which case I apologize), I don't see any for 0.1 and 0.2 releases (I do see branches for them though). Regards, Rajith On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote: > +1 from me as well. I think we have enough vo

Re: [VOTE] 0.3 RC3

2013-01-14 Thread Rafael Schloming
+1 from me as well. I think we have enough votes/time to call this one. I'll post the RC3 as 0.3 shortly. --Rafael On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Ted Ross wrote: > +1 > > Tested against a couple of applications I'm developing. It looks good. > > -Ted > > > On 01/08/2013 09:53 PM, Rafael Schl

Re: [VOTE] 0.3 RC3

2013-01-11 Thread Ted Ross
+1 Tested against a couple of applications I'm developing. It looks good. -Ted On 01/08/2013 09:53 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote: Source is here: http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.3rc3/ Java binaries are here: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-118/ Fixes

Re: [VOTE] 0.3 RC3

2013-01-11 Thread Andrew Stitcher
+1 Tested on FreeBSD 9.1: + cproton builds with gcc + cproton tests clean with manual PYTHONPATH setup. But there are some install caveats (but not enough imo to nack this release) - by default make install puts the libraries in the wrong place for freebsd (in /usr/local/lib64 instead of /usr/loca

Re: [VOTE] 0.3 RC3

2013-01-10 Thread Cliff Jansen
+1 for qpid-proton-c-0.3.tar.gz., builds and proton-test passes on rhel6. For fun, I also tried clang. It builds and runs too, but I had to turn off -Werror to get past a handful of warnings about enums. I will get a JIRA on that for the 0.4 release. Cliff On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Rafae

Re: [VOTE] 0.3 RC3

2013-01-09 Thread Ken Giusti
+1 for qpid-proton-c-0.3.tar.gz. Unpacked & built on my Debian6 i686 vm. Manually set PYTHONPATH and successfully ran proton-tests. -K - Original Message - > Source is here: http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.3rc3/ > Java binaries are here: > https://repository.apache.org/con

Re: [VOTE] 0.3 RC3

2013-01-09 Thread Phil Harvey
+1 Looks good to me. I used Maven to fetch the Java api and implementation jars, and ran the Python tests against them. All tests passed. I also eyeballed the jar contents including the MANIFEST.mf files and everything looked sensible. Phil On 9 January 2013 02:53, Rafael Schloming wrote: >

[VOTE] 0.3 RC3

2013-01-08 Thread Rafael Schloming
Source is here: http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.3rc3/ Java binaries are here: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheqpid-118/ Fixes since RC2 include: - messenger now reports aborted connections - tarball for ruby gem generation - ssl fix (PROTON-171) --Ra