l Message -
>> > From: "Andrew Stitcher"
>> > To: proton@qpid.apache.org, us...@qpid.apache.org
>> > Sent: Thursday, February 4, 2016 2:31:36 PM
>> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Qpid Proton 0.12.0
>> >
>> > On Wed, 2016-02-03 a
ginal Message -
> > From: "Andrew Stitcher"
> > To: proton@qpid.apache.org, us...@qpid.apache.org
> > Sent: Thursday, February 4, 2016 2:31:36 PM
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Qpid Proton 0.12.0
> >
> > On Wed, 2016-02-03 at 07:10 -0800, Justin Ross wrote:
cpp DLLs in the install/bin folder
-C
- Original Message -
> From: "Andrew Stitcher"
> To: proton@qpid.apache.org, us...@qpid.apache.org
> Sent: Thursday, February 4, 2016 2:31:36 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Qpid Proton 0.12.0
>
> On Wed, 2016-02-03 at 07
On Wed, 2016-02-03 at 07:10 -0800, Justin Ross wrote:
> The artifacts proposed for release:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/proton/0.12.0-rc/
>
> Please indicate your vote below. If you favor releasing the 0.12.0
> RC bits
> as 0.12.0 GA, vote +1. If you have reason to think
+1
Testing done: I used it with all of my performance tests:
* point-to-point communication with C and CPP clients.
* many CPP senders and receivers intermediated by a router
The CPP clients exercise the proton::handler event interface.
- Original Message -
The artifacts propo
+1
- I checked the JMS client with 0.12.0-rc against MRG-M 3.2 and against
Qpid C++ broker (trunk with 0.12.0-rc)
- I checked the Qpid Messaging C++ client build with 0.12.0-rc against
MRG-M 3.0
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 4:10 PM, Justin Ross wrote:
> The artifacts proposed for release:
>
> htt
On 3 February 2016 at 15:10, Justin Ross wrote:
> The artifacts proposed for release:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/proton/0.12.0-rc/
>
> Please indicate your vote below. If you favor releasing the 0.12.0 RC bits
> as 0.12.0 GA, vote +1. If you have reason to think the RC i
+1
* Built and ran tests.
* validated signatures and sums
* Built ActiveMQ using the staged maven artifacts and ran all AMQP tests
* Built Qpid-JMS using the staged maven artifacts and ran all the tests.
On 02/03/2016 10:10 AM, Justin Ross wrote:
> The artifacts proposed for release:
>
> http
t;Justin Ross"
> To: us...@qpid.apache.org, proton@qpid.apache.org
> Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 2016 10:10:12 AM
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Qpid Proton 0.12.0
>
> The artifacts proposed for release:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/proton/0.12.0-rc/
&g
The artifacts proposed for release:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/proton/0.12.0-rc/
Please indicate your vote below. If you favor releasing the 0.12.0 RC bits
as 0.12.0 GA, vote +1. If you have reason to think the RC is not ready for
release, vote -1.
Thanks,
Justin
10 matches
Mail list logo