As of last night this is on trunk.
--Rafael
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Ken Giusti kgiu...@redhat.com wrote:
Good improvement.
Once it's on trunk I'll refactor the ssl branch to move the ssl i/o into
the transport, as per the intent.
-K
- Original Message -
On Tue, Sep 4,
Hi Everyone,
I've done some exploratory coding on a small refactor aimed at simplifying
the driver in order to ease both portability and ssl integration. I've
attached the patch. It's not huge, but it removes some of the trickiest
code from driver.c. I believe there are further simplifications
Oops, looks like attachments are stripped. I've posted the patch here:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6910/
--Rafael
I'm trying to figure out what changes are needed on the Java side.
It seems the bind method will be of interest.
Rafi, could you also explain how the refactor is going to help with SSL ?
Rajith
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 5:09 PM, Rafael Schloming r...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I've done
I should also mention that part of the idea is to offer a frame based
transport as an alternative to the byte based transport currently offered.
So a subsequent piece of work on top of this would be to expose the
internal portion of the transport responsible for processing frames and
provide the
