Using FF and/or the patch previously mentioned and no requests are made.
On 22/08/07, Mislav Marohnić [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/22/07, Wiktor Ihárosi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think Sam had reason to write this. I reread Dean Edwards's - who
else? :) - post about the window.onload and
I think many users would be grateful of having additional
libraries/plugins like this. Whilst not necessarily part of the core,
having them logged and available from prototype.js (with all the usual
test cases) would be a nice idea.
Libraries/snippets could/would have peer review for conforming
On 23/08/07, Mislav Marohnić [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/23/07, Richard Quadling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Using FF and/or the patch previously mentioned and no requests are made.
Can you please try
src=//:
... like in Base2 and see if there are requests. Thanks
Being a numpty, my
On 8/23/07, Richard Quadling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This needs to become what? I don't know what Base2 is (sorry).
document.write(script id=__onDOMContentLoaded defer src=//:\/script);
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are
Hi.
I've just created a small function to filter an array. Sort of the
reverse of each+without.
/*
Version 1.0.0 - Thursday, 23 August 2007 10:25 am
*/
Object.extend (
Array.prototype, {
/***/
/* Allow inline filtering
On 23/08/07, Mislav Marohnić [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/23/07, Richard Quadling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This needs to become what? I don't know what Base2 is (sorry).
document.write(script id=__onDOMContentLoaded defer src=//:\/script);
Works fine in IE7 and FF using 1.6.0_rc0. No
On Aug 23, 11:35 am, Richard Quadling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
document.write(script id=__onDOMContentLoaded defer src=//:\/script);
Works fine in IE7 and FF using 1.6.0_rc0. No requests made.
Great! :)
ps: I obviously meant //: when I wrote ://. sorry for the typo...
On 23/08/07, Wiktor Ihárosi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 23, 11:35 am, Richard Quadling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
document.write(script id=__onDOMContentLoaded defer
src=//:\/script);
Works fine in IE7 and FF using 1.6.0_rc0. No requests made.
Great! :)
ps: I obviously meant //:
On Aug 23, 2:03 pm, Richard Quadling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
That's now generating requests.
I think I was not clear enough. The correct and working syntax is //:
which Mislav mentioned. In my first letter I made a typo, but Mislav
wrote the correct syntax for you. He is right,
On 23/08/07, Wiktor Ihárosi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 23, 2:03 pm, Richard Quadling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
That's now generating requests.
I think I was not clear enough. The correct and working syntax is //:
which Mislav mentioned. In my first letter I made a typo, but Mislav
Richard, this seems similar to the standard js 1.6
Array.prototype.filter method. You might be well advised to look at
the Mozilla MDC site for example code that does this.
On Aug 23, 2007, at 2:32 AM, Richard Quadling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi.
I've just created a small function to
Ah. My CHM is upto 1.5 which is why I didn't see it.
On 23/08/07, Jeff Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Richard, this seems similar to the standard js 1.6
Array.prototype.filter method. You might be well advised to look at
the Mozilla MDC site for example code that does this.
On Aug 23,
As soon as I get some free time from work, I'll rewrite a lot of
active support for js
(http://code.google.com/p/active-support-for-javascript), including
all necessary adjustments to work well with 1.6 (like removing the
interpolation methods, which are now useless :))
Best regards,
-Nicolas
On
Howdy!
http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/9358
I'm pretty sure that Event.element() is misbehaving. Thoughts?
Pete
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype: Core group.
To post to this group,
Mislav Marohnic' wrote:
...
Ken, these are nice and certainly useful, but I don't think most of
the people have a need for them. Most of the heavy-duty date/time
logic should be kept in your application (server-side). But I'll let
other core members speak for themselves.
You're
On Aug 22, 2:11 pm, Mislav Marohnić [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 8/22/07, ben [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyway, to each his own. I'm guessing your friends balked at the
self.prototype.instanceMethod = function() {...} syntax. That bit can
be improved, I think. If you use the closure
16 matches
Mail list logo
