[Prototype-core] Re: Bug : Object.isNumber() and Hash.toQueryString()

2008-10-09 Thread atrepp
You are surely right about the utility of Number object over primitives and the overhead it can be. I use the Number Constructor to parse string and convert to Number and store it like that in my cache. In the cache, there are other custom objects that inherits from Number. Cordially, Alex On 8 o

[Prototype-core] Re: Bug : Object.isNumber() and Hash.toQueryString()

2008-10-09 Thread Tobie Langel
> there are other custom objects that inherits from Number. And that works cross-browser !? Best, Tobie --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prototype: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to p

[Prototype-core] Re: Bug : Object.isNumber() and Hash.toQueryString()

2008-10-09 Thread atrepp
I just want to be compatible with Firefox or Webkit. I don't use IE :) On 9 oct, 10:18, Tobie Langel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > there are other custom objects that inherits from Number. > > And that works cross-browser !? > > Best, > > Tobie --~--~-~--~~~---~--~---

[Prototype-core] Re: методы загрузки prot otype

2008-10-09 Thread Rauan Maemirov
Это называется lazy load. Погуглите, в нете материалов про это куча. А вообще, с такими вопросами лучше идти к http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous On Oct 6, 7:15 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > столкнулся с такой проблемой... > нужно загружать prototype че

[Prototype-core] Re: Bug : Object.isNumber() and Hash.toQueryString()

2008-10-09 Thread kangax
On Oct 9, 4:11 am, atrepp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You are surely right about the utility of Number object over > primitives and the overhead it can be. I use the Number Constructor to > parse string and convert to Number and store it like that in my cache. Why don't you use `Number` (as a fu

[Prototype-core] Re: Bug : Object.isNumber() and Hash.toQueryString()

2008-10-09 Thread atrepp
I learnt something, i didn't know that you can use Number as a function, i think i will move to primitives. thanks, Alex :) On 9 oct, 15:40, kangax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Oct 9, 4:11 am, atrepp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > You are surely right about the utility of Number object over

[Prototype-core] Re: element.up() Issue

2008-10-09 Thread EMoreth
I couldnt reproduce the error out of my project... But looking to the watch of VS2008 i get... + document{object}DispHTMLDocument target.tagName "INPUT" String target.up(6).className "messageItem" String + target.up