On Sep 21, 4:40 pm, Yaffle vic99...@yandex.ru wrote:
base2.js uses prefix for it's Map Class
Yes, but it uses a 1 char string - '#' - so the chance of collisions
is still high (imo).
[...]
--
kangax
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you
kangax, there are no collisions if everything is prefixed like Yaffle suggests.
Allen Madsen
http://www.allenmadsen.com
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 8:03 AM, kangax kan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sep 21, 4:40 pm, Yaffle vic99...@yandex.ru wrote:
base2.js uses prefix for it's Map Class
Yes, but it
base2.js uses prefix for it's Map Class
On 14 сен, 19:53, Yaffle vic99...@yandex.ru wrote:
Sorry, I'm not following again :) What's not necessary? Which requests
will be more expensive?
May be, for-in loop will iterate a little more ...
There is an issue with Hash#toObject method...
I think, Ajax.Base#parameters can be Hash instead of object to avoid
call to Hash#toObject...
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype: Core group.
To
On Sep 14, 6:18 am, Tobie Langel tobie.lan...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry, I'm not following. How does prefixing a key avoid object
creation? We can't inject stuff directly onto a hash instance. We
still need an object for that.
Not necessarily. Though that might make some requests more
++IE dontEnum bug =)
var h = $H({});
h.set('toString',1);
alert(h.toJSON());
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype: Core group.
To post to this group, send email to
On Sep 13, 9:32 am, Yaffle vic99...@yandex.ru wrote:
var h = $H({});
h.set('__proto__','sadfdsf');
alert( typeof( h.get('__proto__') ));
That's a known limitation, actually (although, probably not documented
anywhere). There's no key coercion in Prototype's Hash implementation,
which is why
You're right, `hasOwnProperty` can be useless, and
`propertyIsEnumerable` is useless becauseof dontEnum IE bug...
Why not to patch Hash to use some prefix for keys?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Why not to patch Hash to use some prefix for keys?
That was my plan for 1.7, actually.
It fixes that issue and also avoids creating an extra, internal
object.
Good to see that we're on the same page, here.
Tobie
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message
On Sep 13, 6:38 pm, Tobie Langel tobie.lan...@gmail.com wrote:
Why not to patch Hash to use some prefix for keys?
That was my plan for 1.7, actually.
It fixes that issue and also avoids creating an extra, internal
object.
Sorry, I'm not following. How does prefixing a key avoid object
10 matches
Mail list logo
