Andrew, great to hear 1.6.0.3 is coming soon, I'm sure 1.6.1 is going
to be great. There are great ideas floating around for it, although I
hope that by the time 1.6.1 is released it won't be seen as Prototype
playing catch-up. Maybe that's unavoidable though with funded
frameworks around the corn
I like Prototype because it takes all the work out of Javascript. I've been
using it for a few years now but as a PHP developer I usually only used it
for Ajax. Only recently have I started to get acquainted with all of its
other components, and it is a pleasure to work with. Just last night, for
f
On Sep 26, 10:30 am, Nick Stakenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not sure if Prototype has a real future, at the moment it seems to
> be getting more and more a side project for it's authors. The reason
> jQuery is so popular is it's community
The last few months have been unusual for Protot
Kangax,
Your method indeed appears to be the most suitable option at this
moment. Thanks!
On Sep 26, 11:40 pm, kangax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sep 26, 9:54 am, Rumith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi,
> > I'm trying to implement a method that would allow to use
> > Class.create() in
Hi, I a new user from Prototype (2 weaks so far)
I am begin to look diferents libraries: prototype, jquery, mootools, etc.
After some time I decide to use prototype because I feel what have
better documentation for beginer (can be better) like me. I just only
use AJAX. I am doing a application we
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 11:52:47AM -0700, Diodeus wrote:
> One this that I always thought strange is why it is called "Prototype"
> -- it makes it seem like it's half-built and experimental, rather than
> a usable product. While I understand the OO reference, I'm sure many
> don't.
>
> Perhaps th
On Sep 26, 9:54 am, Rumith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm trying to implement a method that would allow to use
> Class.create() inheriting HTML elements like div instead of other
> classes. That is, the result would be something like this (the syntax
> is arbitrary and is for demo purposes
One this that I always thought strange is why it is called "Prototype"
-- it makes it seem like it's half-built and experimental, rather than
a usable product. While I understand the OO reference, I'm sure many
don't.
Perhaps the suggestion of merging the two is a valid one (even if they
continue
> First problem with your scenario is you're sending in a string as the
> superclass, this isn't going to work regardless.
That's what I meant when I said that the syntax is arbitrary :) I
understand that in reality I'll have to use a wrapper function of some
kind, but what kind of a function exa
$$("ul.myMenu, ul.myMenu ul").each(function(ele){
Sortable.create(ele);
});
On Sep 26, 5:16 am, David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want my customer to arrange menu and sub menus as he like it to be.
> So :
>
>
> First item
> Second item
> Third item
>
>
You don't say if you're having any problems with this, but you can
remove the autocomplete (invalid) attribute -- Scripty adds that
behavior automagically. Otherwise, this looks okay from the calling
side.
If your return includes anything besides a bare list (and these
strong tags count,
A very good idea, something I had pondered as well but never came up
with a solution I was satisfied with.
First problem with your scenario is you're sending in a string as the
superclass, this isn't going to work regardless. You could use new
Element('div') but this is going to create a static
On Sep 26, 9:46 am, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, I let say I've an object created like this
>
> my_slider = new Control.Slider(handle, track, options);
>
> How can I do to completely destroy this instance ?
my_slider.dispose();
handler.remove();
track.remove();
>
> Thanks
--
kangax
Thanks Walter, that cleared things up.
Here is a link to the HTML that contains the new Ajax.Autocompleter
code as well as my input field and response div. The PHP script
prints a string of the following format:
[ul]
[li id="1234"][strong]Perk[/strong]ins, Justin[/li]
[li id="5678"][stron
What prototype desperately needs is a better community than a group on
google! I mean, there are much better interfaces for communities, and
there's an irony there that prototype is supposed to be promoting the
better use of interfaces... Also merging prototype and scriptaculous
into one project I
I'm not sure if Prototype has a real future, at the moment it seems to
be getting more and more a side project for it's authors. The reason
jQuery is so popular is it's community, it's certainly not those
points in your article since those are true for most frameworks.
People who write those artic
When the Autocompleter says "returns", it means returns in the same
way that when you request a page from a Web server, the server
returns that page. It's a HTTP return, not a PHP return.
A function (in PHP or any language) may return a string or other
variable. But that string won't go any
I like Prototype better than any other framework :p
-justin
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegro
While I am strong advocate of Prototype and Script.aculo.us, I find
that the vast majority of discussion/coverage on the web is focussed
on jQuery. I understand that there are not huge differences in the
capabilities of these two libraries, so why has jQuery gained such
popularity vs Prototype?
T
Hi,
I'm trying to implement a method that would allow to use
Class.create() inheriting HTML elements like div instead of other
classes. That is, the result would be something like this (the syntax
is arbitrary and is for demo purposes only):
var Block = Class.create("div", {
initialize: functio
Hello, I let say I've an object created like this
my_slider = new Control.Slider(handle, track, options);
How can I do to completely destroy this instance ?
Thanks
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"
Hi,
i have a often seen problem in Internet Explorer with scriptaculous
(newest version). When i want to use the SlideDown effect the elements
first get visible and after that the Effect starts, so you can see the
whole element and then it desappears and it slides down. Why is it
visible at the b
Hi,
I want my customer to arrange menu and sub menus as he like it to be.
So :
First item
Second item
Third item
First sub item
Second sub item
Third sub item
Fourth item
Fifth item
Sortable.create('myMenu');
But it take only the first le
Sorry for the late response,
I tried to replace my javascript with this one :
Event.observe(window, "load", function() {
Event.observe("chkAll", "click", function(event) {
//var element = event.element();
$$("input.chk").each(function(aCheck) {
Thanks Justin!
With your help now it is working finally :-)
Though it does not respect the hover state when I set explicitly the
background color as in your code snippet. I had to set the background
style to empty string:
var element = $('');
element.highlight({ afterFinish: function(effect
Hi Mike,
Thanks for posting back. I think the 'out of memory' thing is a
Firebug bug, not a bug in your code or Prototype. Good you were able
to find the underlying problem.
-- T.J. :-)
On Sep 26, 4:14 am, MikeFeltman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Just wanted to let you know I was abl
Hi Yanosz,
Can you provide a couple of concrete examples of silent failures?
Maybe post a minimalist page demonstrating a couple of them to
Pastie[1]? For the most part (IMHO) silent failures are a Bad Thing
and so examples should be reported as bugs. But it doesn't hurt to
discuss them first,
So I am using the prototype and scriptaculous on my webpage that I am
designing with CakePHP.
This is my link that I am using:
echo $ajax->link($html->image('/img/portfolio/small/' .
$portfolio['Portfolio']['picture'], array('alt' =>
$portfolio['Portfolio']['title'])), '/portfolios/view/' .
$por
Hello,
I'm using prototype & scriptaculous in various Ruby-on-Rails applications,
some of them do a lot of prototype & ajax stuff with RoR-Helpers.
But what I'ven't figured out yet is:
Is there a way to do exception-Handling with prototype?
While classic JavaScript exception handling uses try/ca
29 matches
Mail list logo
