Hi,
> Basically my js works fine in FF, IE8, and safari, but completely
> fails in IE6. The relevant source is below:
Nothing jumped out in the source (but then, there was virtually no
source to look at! :-) ), but usually this means you have a dangling
comma somewhere, like this:
var AjaxTabber
Hi all,
I'm very much a prototype/js newb and I'm working on my first site.
I've searched around for an answer to this question but apparently my
google-fu is weak. Hopefully someone here might be able to point me in
the right direction.
Basically my js works fine in FF, IE8, and safari, but comp
Thanks for the reply T.J.,
Hmm.. Yeah it just seems like there's no way to win in this case. On
one hand, I have to resort to redundancy of setting var blah = this;
inside my class methods-- Otherwise, in some of my more intense
methods, I have function calls inside function calls, and have to
TJ,
Thanks for the detailed response. I mostly came to terms with this
resolution but I was hoping another programmer would prove me wrong.
It seems it can be somewhat accomplished with jQuery and PHP but
jQuery and Prototype do not currently get along all that well and I'd
had to bring that prob
Hi Patrick,
> I don't quite get how I would also be able to pass in the class 'this'
> instance to someFunc other than having a var foo = this; at the top of
> the initialize block..
>
> Can you see a way to get around that?
Since you replied to Jonathan that you wanted access to both #foo and
th
Hmmm ... What do you mean by "access to #foo?"
--
Jonathan Rosenberg
Founder & Executive Director, Tabby's Place
http://www.tabbysplace.org/
-Original Message-
From: prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
[mailto:prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of patrick
Sent: Fr
Hello,
can anyone please help me out with a Ajax Updater?!
My script:
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
On Apr 9, 9:53 am, "Jonathan Rosenberg" wrote:
> Ok, I haven't thought this out fully, but how about
>
>Event.addBehavior({
> '#foo:click': (function() {
> someFunc(this)).bind(this)
>}
Right.. that gives me access
Ok, I haven't thought this out fully, but how about
Event.addBehavior({
'#foo:click': (function() {
someFunc(this)).bind(this)
}
--
Jonathan Rosenberg
Founder & Executive Director, Tabby's Place
http://www.tabbysplace.
Thanks for the reply T.J.,
When using 'this', one other problem comes up for me which I wasn't
sure how to address. I use lowpro along with prototype for it's
Event.addBehavior stuff...
So, if I do:
var Foo = (function() {
var Foo = Class.create({
initialize: function()
Hi,
> I think the site needs an integrated contribution system for Prototype
> Extensions, better than jQuery's(http://plugins.jquery.com/).
One thing at a time. :-) And of course, there's scripteka.com.
> Some want something easier than learning git,
> rake, lighthouse, etc., in order to contr
Hi,
> So this solves that problem-- but global variables are "evil"..
> BUT.. this is in the context of a closure, so I wonder if it's less
> evil?
The global variable is not affected by the fact it's being created by
code in a closure, you're still (implicitly) creating a `photos`
property on t
Hi everyone,
My question is-- quite often I do something like this:
var Photos = (function() {
var Photos = Class.create({
initialize: function() {
var photos = this;
//etc
}
return Photos;
})();
and then when I have class methods, I have redefine a
So here's what I am trying to do.
I have a form with two fields: issue and subissue. The
second (subissue) is hidden by default. When the user selects one of
the items in the first (issue), I want to populate the second with
only certain options.
So I have all the options in the subissue and
14 matches
Mail list logo
