Hi,
> I found that array looping method online, I guess I will remove that
> page from my bookmarks.
Yes, it's an extremely common misconception.
> Thanks for setting me right :)
No worries!
-- T.J. :-)
On Aug 1, 5:23 pm, Rog wrote:
> Thanks very much, that makes a lot of sense now.
>
> I fo
Idea fof next upgrade: I notice that there is no anchor point in
Effect.Scale - it would be nice to have the option to have the element
grow out from the bottom right, top right or bottom left, as opposed
to just the top left.
I'd try and add it myself, but I'm not very familiar with the code.
An
I'm experiencing a weird problem with prototype 1.7RC and
scriptaculous.
A Draggable with options {ghosting:true, revert:true, scroll:window}
doesn't ghost or revert.
Anyone else seen this?
--
M.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Prototype & script.
Thank you! It works, yes!
The problem was, that the response from my server contained another
element (div):
...
Of course that's not well-formed. All browsers ignore it, except
Chrome. So I moved the div and everything is fine now!
Thx, Patrick
On 1 Aug., 12:59, "T.J. Crowder" wrote:
>
Thanks very much, that makes a lot of sense now.
I found that array looping method online, I guess I will remove that
page from my bookmarks.
Thanks for setting me right :)
On 1 Aug, 11:47, "T.J. Crowder" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> `for..in` is not for looping through the indexes of an array, it's for
>
So if you ask or answer a question here and don't see it via the
Groups web interface in the first couple of minutes, don't worry,
unless you got an error it _will_ appear eventually... But we're
talking half an hour sometimes.
-- T.J.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
Hi,
That code works for me using Chrome 5:
http://jsbin.com/opafu3
Maybe you can see what's different between the above and your test
case...
--
T.J. Crowder
Independent Software Consultant
tj / crowder software / com
www.crowdersoftware.com
On Jul 30, 8:22 pm, patrick wrote:
> Hi to all,
>
> I
Hi,
> Form.serialize(true) sends the true value even
> when it is not checked.
Not in my experience:
http://jsbin.com/uxiko4
HTH,
--
T.J. Crowder
Independent Software Consultant
tj / crowder software / com
www.crowdersoftware.com
On Jul 30, 6:56 pm, strimp099 wrote:
> Greetings all:
>
> When s
Hi,
`for..in` is not for looping through the indexes of an array, it's for
looping through the property names of an object. More in the API docs:
http://api.prototypejs.org/language/array/
...and in the unofficial wiki:
http://proto-scripty.wikidot.com/prototype:tip-looping-through-arrays
HTH,
On 30 July 2010 18:56, strimp099 wrote:
> Greetings all:
>
> When sending form variables as a hash using Form.serialize(true), the
> value attribute of unchecked checkboxes is sent to the POST page. This
> of course is contrary to how HTML treats checkbox form variables.
>
> for example, I have th
Hi there everyone, I am pretty new to javascript but do a lot of other
programming.
Something is not working as expected. Here's a bit of code I am
testing :
==
var smileySet = new Array();
smileySet['test'] = 'hello';
for (var smiley in smileySet)
Hi to all,
I've got to update a -Container with appending another row via
XHR. That works perfect in IE6-8, Safari and FF, but does not work in
Google's Chrome 5. I'm using Prototype 1.6.1.
Here is some sample code:
--
bla bla
Link Text
--
The URL
Greetings all:
When sending form variables as a hash using Form.serialize(true), the
value attribute of unchecked checkboxes is sent to the POST page. This
of course is contrary to how HTML treats checkbox form variables.
for example, I have the following checkboxes:
I only want destructor an
Hello!
sounds good, first thing i would try is testing proto-scripty's
drag'n'drop feature, i think that is technically somelike what you
want...
YT
BB
Am 29.07.2010 um 13:41 schrieb Richard Quadling:
Hi.
I'm developing a tiny little web page app which allows vehicle
inspectors to see
14 matches
Mail list logo