[Proto-Scripty] Re: 1.6.1 RC2: What happened to $A()?

2009-04-16 Thread kangax
On Apr 15, 11:19 am, mr_justin gro...@jperkins.otherinbox.com wrote: [...] (). Looks like this is one regression bug that has really helped us out. That's funny : ) Yes, I'll definitely make a patch to type convert `iterable`. Thanks for catching that. [...] -- kangax

[Proto-Scripty] Re: 1.6.1 RC2: What happened to $A()?

2009-04-15 Thread mr_justin
Well damn, it looks like the iterable.toArray() stuff has been in there for quite some time. I looked back through all the versions of prototype we have been using for the last year and this method has remained mostly the same. I'm now thinking this has been buggy code in our application for a

[Proto-Scripty] Re: 1.6.1 RC2: What happened to $A()?

2009-04-14 Thread kangax
On Apr 13, 6:25 pm, mr_justin gro...@jperkins.otherinbox.com wrote: This is a regression. OK, that's good to hear. so `$A('one', 'two', 'three')`, as in your example, should produce - ['o', 'n', 'e']. That doesn't seem right. In the past, it has always produced a 3-item array out of

[Proto-Scripty] Re: 1.6.1 RC2: What happened to $A()?

2009-04-13 Thread kangax
On Apr 13, 12:51 pm, mr_justin gro...@jperkins.otherinbox.com wrote: Trying out the RC2 and ran into some trouble with existing code working with the new version of prototype. Old code: $A('one', 'two', 'three') This no longer works and requires either to wrap the arguments in square