7.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 11:05 AM
To: psas-airframe@lists.psas.pdx.edu
Subject: Re: [psas-airframe] Not so much lasers...
(2010.01.21) aa...@bavariati.org:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 04:30:03PM -0800, Andrew Greenberg wrote:
> > So I've gotten quite a bit of feedback f
(2010.01.21) aa...@bavariati.org:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 04:30:03PM -0800, Andrew Greenberg wrote:
> > So I've gotten quite a bit of feedback from people on laser cutting the
> > avionics plates, and the answer is, in general, "bad idea".
>
> Dumb queston from someone who hasn't been following
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 04:30:03PM -0800, Andrew Greenberg wrote:
> So I've gotten quite a bit of feedback from people on laser cutting the
> avionics plates, and the answer is, in general, "bad idea".
Dumb queston from someone who hasn't been following closely enough: any reason
these can't be do
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 10:44 PM, I wrote:
> WTF? Did you speak with Ron (Duffy) at LCS? Perhaps I'm missing something
> here, but unless you asked for very thick plates, that shouldn't be a
> problem. It sounds like the kind of blow off I've heard when I've asked for
> a freebee as a 'student org
WTF? Did you speak with Ron (Duffy) at LCS? Perhaps I'm missing
something here, but unless you asked for very thick plates, that
shouldn't be a problem. It sounds like the kind of blow off I've heard
when I've asked for a freebee as a 'student organization'.
So how thick are the parts you r
So I've gotten quite a bit of feedback from people on laser cutting the
avionics plates, and the answer is, in general, "bad idea".
Apparently with so many little holes, the part heats up and warps
("potato chips" or "bananas" or pick your own curvy fruit analogy here).
So, apparently, what we wa