Before I was on the board, I also used to wonder what was being
discussed behind closed doors. Spoiler alert: it's far less exciting
than you might expect. As Tim Peters once put it: "Exciting as
watching rocks sleep? Yup, but essential - the glory of serving on the
Board isn't for everyone ;-)".
One thing we could do is publish agendas either in full or in part before the
Board meetings. This could give time for members to express opinions and
concerns to the Board.
I am not a current Board member, and won't know until Tuesday if I am going to
be a Board member, and haven't spoken wit
User testing?
On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Steve Holden wrote:
> Stand for the board and make sure it becomes more transparent? S
>
> Steve Holden
>
> On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 3:15 PM, Carl Karsten
> wrote:
>
>> All of the people nominated for the PSF board are good people who will do
>> g
Stand for the board and make sure it becomes more transparent? S
Steve Holden
On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 3:15 PM, Carl Karsten
wrote:
> All of the people nominated for the PSF board are good people who will do
> good things. If things were running smooth, I wouldn't really care who
> gets electe
All of the people nominated for the PSF board are good people who will do
good things. If things were running smooth, I wouldn't really care who
gets elected.
But once again, we see people asking questions due to lack of transparency.
So once again, I ask: What will you do about it?
--
Carl K
