Re: Test Failure

2006-04-16 Thread Ben Pfaff
John Darrington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm not sure what all the columns mean in > tests/expressions/randist/chisq.out. Can we add an explanation somewhere? It'd certainly be a good idea. It's all generated by a script, so the script could be modified to add the explanations. > Is the 5

Re: Test Failure

2006-04-16 Thread John Darrington
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 06:44:39PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: John Darrington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Suddenly a clean check-out gives me: > > 42c42 > < .99 2.00 9.21 .99 .00 .01 > --- >> .99 2.00 9.21 .99

Re: Test Failure

2006-04-16 Thread Ben Pfaff
John Darrington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Suddenly a clean check-out gives me: > > 42c42 > < .99 2.00 9.21 .99 .00 .01 > --- >> .99 2.00 9.21 .99 .01 .01 > compare output for chisq distribution > FAILED > FAIL: tests/expressions/randist

Re: use /, : for dirs, paths on Windows?

2006-04-16 Thread Ben Pfaff
John Darrington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 02:14:52PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: > Currently we use \ and ; for dirs and paths on Windows, because > that's the local convention. However, I understand that most GNU > software uses / and :, even on Windows. B

Test Failure

2006-04-16 Thread John Darrington
Suddenly a clean check-out gives me: 42c42 < .99 2.00 9.21 .99 .00 .01 --- > .99 2.00 9.21 .99 .01 .01 compare output for chisq distribution FAILED FAIL: tests/expressions/randist.sh -- PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3 fingerprint = 8

Re: use /, : for dirs, paths on Windows?

2006-04-16 Thread John Darrington
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 02:14:52PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: Currently we use \ and ; for dirs and paths on Windows, because that's the local convention. However, I understand that most GNU software uses / and :, even on Windows. Being uniform would allow use to get rid of DIR_S

use /, : for dirs, paths on Windows?

2006-04-16 Thread Ben Pfaff
Currently we use \ and ; for dirs and paths on Windows, because that's the local convention. However, I understand that most GNU software uses / and :, even on Windows. Being uniform would allow use to get rid of DIR_SEPARATOR and PATH_SEPARATOR, which are kind of ugly. What do you guys think?

Re: OK to fix warnings in GUI code?

2006-04-16 Thread John Darrington
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 05:59:31PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: I see quite a few warnings in GUI code (shown below). John, is it okay for me to touch this code? I don't think anyone but you has worked on the GUI up until now, so I don't want to disturb anything that you're in the