[patch #6412] GET DATA TYPE=TXT extensions

2008-02-08 Thread Jason H Stover
Follow-up Comment #3, patch #6412 (project pspp): >After applying this patch and the patch for the import of text >data, I got a compilation error because INT_BUFSIZE_BOUND and >NOT_REACHED were undefined in /src/data/dictionary.c. I thought my >old copy of gnulib caused this, but updating didn't

Re: [Pspp-cvs] pspp/src/ui/gui data-editor.h

2008-02-08 Thread Jason Stover
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 09:28:04AM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote: > That's odd. I'm pretty sure I didn't commit anything of the > text-import stuff yet; if I did, it was by mistake. I think you > must have checked in part of my patch. Oops. I just removed it. -Jason _

Re: [Pspp-cvs] pspp/src/ui/gui data-editor.h

2008-02-08 Thread Ben Pfaff
Jason H Stover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > --- data-editor.h 29 Jan 2008 11:12:59 - 1.28 > +++ data-editor.h 8 Feb 2008 17:22:27 - 1.29 > @@ -31,6 +31,8 @@ >GtkAction *action_data_save_as; >GtkAction *action_data_save; > > + GtkAction *invoke_text_import_ass

[patch #6412] GET DATA TYPE=TXT extensions

2008-02-08 Thread Jason H Stover
Follow-up Comment #2, patch #6412 (project pspp): After applying this patch and the patch for the import of text data, I got a compilation error because INT_BUFSIZE_BOUND and NOT_REACHED were undefined in /src/data/dictionary.c. I thought my old copy of gnulib caused this, but updating didn't fix

[patch #6376] crosstabs dialog

2008-02-08 Thread Jason H Stover
Update of patch #6376 (project pspp): Status: Ready For Test/Review => Done Open/Closed:Open => Closed ___ Reply to this item at:

[patch #6376] crosstabs dialog

2008-02-08 Thread John Darrington
Follow-up Comment #12, patch #6376 (project pspp): I think this is ready to check in. Can you change "2007" to "2008" in crosstabs-dialog.h ___ Reply to this item at: _

[patch #6412] GET DATA TYPE=TXT extensions

2008-02-08 Thread John Darrington
Follow-up Comment #1, patch #6412 (project pspp): The changes to helper.[ch] don't seem to be used anywhere in this patch. I suppose if this is a pspp extension, then it ought to be protected by the --syntax=enhanced flag. ___ Reply to