[patch #6650] one pass covariance algorithm

2008-11-05 Thread John Darrington
Follow-up Comment #22, patch #6650 (project pspp): I think that you have made a mistake here: result->accumulate = (result == LISTWISE) ? For consistency, I think that covariance_accumulate should be renamed to covariance_matrix_accumulate. It would be better if the "missing_value" paramete

Re: New stable snapshot

2008-11-05 Thread Simon Josefsson
"Michel Boaventura" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Could you add this fix to the next snapshot Ben? I'm still have > problems trying to compile a git version of pspp using mingw :( What are these snapshots? Would a daily build of gnulib in *.tar.gz format be useful? I suppose it could make testi

Re: New stable snapshot

2008-11-05 Thread Ben Pfaff
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ben Pfaff wrote: >> diff --git a/modules/close b/modules/close >> index e526487..bb852d4 100644 >> --- a/modules/close >> +++ b/modules/close >> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ close() function: close a file or socket. >> >> Files: >> lib/close.c >> +lib/w32sock.h >>

Re: status report

2008-11-05 Thread Ben Pfaff
John Darrington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 10:46:53PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote: > I want to automatically build and upload binaries for a few > different platforms: > > * Any others, that someone requests, for which I can >obtain or b

Re: Fwd: a new factory build?

2008-11-05 Thread Ben Pfaff
unknown-1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It might take a few days to work out the kinks in the system, so > it's possible that some builds will get skipped, etc. > > It would be rather convenient if instead of a date, you named the > tarballs after their commit hash. Eg

Re: New stable snapshot

2008-11-05 Thread Michel Boaventura
Could you add this fix to the next snapshot Ben? I'm still have problems trying to compile a git version of pspp using mingw :( ___ pspp-dev mailing list pspp-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-dev

[patch #6650] one pass covariance algorithm

2008-11-05 Thread Jason H Stover
Follow-up Comment #21, patch #6650 (project pspp): Done: I removed the tests for missing values from covariance_accumulate_listwise and added a comment to match_nodes. I also added a comment explaining how to use covariance_accumulate. Most recent patch attached. (file #16788)

Re: Fwd: a new factory build?

2008-11-05 Thread unknown-1
g a typo in the reported name. What about generating a list in which every generated tarball with its commit hash is listed? An other solution might be appending the latest commit hash to the currentname. Like pspp-merge-20081105-47e6024280cbc95dbfa637009091cc8404c84fb0.tar.gz. If Ben can handle this

Re: Fwd: a new factory build?

2008-11-05 Thread John Darrington
On Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 10:03:57PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote: unknown-1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Providing the latest nightly build would be the most convenient > option for me. I've now obtained some hosting that is convenient enough that I can now do a night

Re: status report

2008-11-05 Thread John Darrington
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 10:46:53PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote: I've been spending a considerable amount of time in the last few days on getting the PSPP nightly test build and snapshot upload working. There is still some work left on that. In particular, I want to automatically bu

Re: New stable snapshot

2008-11-05 Thread Bruno Haible
Ben Pfaff wrote: > > close.c:30:21: w32sock.h: No such file or directory > [...] > > The file w32sock.h should be supplied by the pspp package, or by mingw? > > By gnulib. It looks like the "close" module has a missing > dependency on lib/w32sock.h. Yes. I can reproduce it through "./gnulib-tool

(no subject)

2008-11-05 Thread unknown-1
>On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 10:39:29PM -0500, Martin Therrien-B?lec wrote: > But if I have windows, how I can try one of Ben's recent "master" >snapshots. > > And how I can install one of Ben's recent "master" snapshots??? > >See the file called INSTALL. For windows specific advice, it's >pr