cross compiling PSPP

After Ben's push of last night, cross compiling on openSUSE for MSWindows works without an error. Now, libpspp.a libpspp.la libpspp-core.a libpspp-core.la are generated in the lib directory. But no .dll's. I had the same issue 15 may 2008 with the cygwin version. Maybe this

New issue with PSPP-Master when cross-compiling

Hi When cross-compiling the latest version. The system can't find pwd.h used src/output/odt.c Most likely this is because it is generated somewhere with a utility not installed yet. Because it is a cross-compiling this isn't checked during configure if a utility from the host is used. Any idea w

Re: merged "output" into "master"

Hi >Tonight, I decided that the "output" branch seemed to be good >enough to merge into "master", so I did. Great, will you send the latest tarball.po to the translation project so the translators can start translating the new features? Have fun ___

Re: cross compiling PSPP

If I cross-compile the pspp-master version I get another error: i686-pc-mingw32-gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I./gl -I./gl -DINSTALLDIR=\"/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/bin\" -DDOCDIR=\"/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/pspp\" -I./src -I./lib -DPKGDATADIR=\"/usr/i686-pc-min

cross compiling PSPP

Hi I was trying to cross-compile PSPP for MSWindows on openSUSE. It seems as if this will be possible, but I have some issues. The main issue is that no libraries are created yet. Could it be the problem that I compile on GNU/Linux for MSWindows? I placed my Howto in progress on: http://sakla.net

Re: CA and ES translations completed

Ok I changed the wiki again. Moved the spanish translation to available and mentioned that you can use the pspp.mo generated for a linux environment on MSWindows. Have fun ___ pspp-dev mailing list pspp-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinf

Fwd: too few arguments to function 'gen_tempname'

2010/2/2 Ben Pfaff > > unknown-1 writes: > > > - stable-20100130 compiles but reports that it is 0.6.2-rc1 is this > > just an older name? > > I goofed.  I never pushed the final 0.6.2 commit to the "stable" > branch.  I've fixed this now. Right >

Re: What happens with

>I was triyng to contact M.Boaventura to ask him how to add new language .mo >files to the WindowsMinGW build. BUT it seems to be some problem with > >Does anyone knows what happens? Server down I guess. At least there are some problems over there. >Can I ask for some help about activating or a

Re: too few arguments to function 'gen_tempname'

2010/1/29 Ben Pfaff <>: >> [...] > > (Let me know again if it doesn't.) Hi My findings: - stable-20100130 compiles but reports that it is 0.6.2-rc1 is this just an older name? - output-20100130 has still the error with gen_tempname - master-2010130 askes for makeinfo which seems not correct to

Re: too few arguments to function 'gen_tempname'

2010/1/29 Ben Pfaff <>: [...] >>> -- >> >> No, I downloaded the latest stable and output version from >> http://pspp.benpfaff.org/~blp/ I guess this should be the correct >> version? > > Yes. > > The build script had a bug.  I hope that I have fixed it now. > > You can also get "make dist" distribu

Re: too few arguments to function 'gen_tempname'

2010/1/27 Ben Pfaff : > unknown-1 writes: > >>>Re: too few arguments to function 'gen_tempname' >>>michel writes: >> >>>> I'm having the above error while trying to compile the snapshot >>>> http://pspp.benpfaff.org/~blp/psp

Re: Re: too few arguments to function 'gen_tempname'

>Re: too few arguments to function 'gen_tempname' >michel writes: >> I'm having the above error while trying to compile the snapshot >> http://pspp.benpfaff.org/~blp/pspp-master-20091115.tar.gz. >> >> src/data/make-file.c: In function 'replace_file_start': >> src/data/make-file.c:180: error: too

re; Re: Dutch translation

>There must be a way we can automate this? > >J' I did some research. Have a look at http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/bison.git/tree/bootstrap I guess if Ben includes this in the nightly builds, the translations are always up to date. Have fun ___ ps

Dutch translation

I just uploaded the latest dutch translation for the master version to the translation project. The current dutch translation in the master version is very outdated. Can you developers include the latest translation file in the master version? Have fun ___

Re: Re: German translation

>We are happy to have new translations. You can start by joining >the German translation team. There is some information at: >http://translationproject.org/html/translators.html Or have a look at http://sakla.net/cgi-bin/oddmuse.cgi/Localization_and_Translations But.I know several people wh

Re: Re: Fw: PSPP Suggestion

>You can checkout the master branch from the Git repository. See >http://savannah.gnu.org/git/?group=pspp for further information. I myself think downloading the master or stable version from http://pspp.benpfaff.org/~blp/ is more convenient. Have fun _

Re: Text in po files

ility.q:585 src/language/stats/reliability.q:596 and #: src/language/stats/reliability.q:601 Have fun 2009/10/4 John Darrington : > I've pushed a fix addressing this.  Thanks for reporting it. > > On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 08:29:53PM +0200, unknown-1 wrote: >     Hi > >     I

Text in po files

Hi Is there a reason why "big-endian" and "little-endian" on src/data/sys-file-reader.c:934 and "Big Endian" and "Little Endian" on src/language/dictionary/sys-file-info.c:127 and 128 is written different? If not, unifying them would reduce the po files. Have fun.

Re: GNU PSPP 0.6.2-pre6 now available/translation

>This is really a bug in the FREQUENCIES procedure source code. I >think that I will have to fix it by writing "Valid Percent" as a >single string, so that it can be translated properly as >"Percentual Valido". I guess that is the only solution. >I'll make a note to take care of this. This woul

-pre6

Pre6 works fine on openSUSE 11.1 as far as i can see. Have fun ___ pspp-dev mailing list pspp-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-dev

Re: Re: GNU PSPP 0.6.2-pre6 now available Date:

>Could you please send the pot file to Translation Project? As far as I understand that doesn't make much sense. There won't be textual differences from earlier version. So the 0.6.2-pre4 translations can be used. However, it won't heart either if the pot file is uploaded to the Translation projec

Re: a little start at improving PSPP translatability

Internationalization is always fun. :-) and I think this is more internationalization as translation. A few thoughts about the remarks: 2009/7/16 John Darrington : > Regarding commit "Avoid translating strings that don't need translation", > I think your assertion that "Strings such as "%d" do no

Re: Re: Problem with output file on windows

>I really have no idea if Windows allows HOMEPATH to be a network path. MSWindows allows a drive character and a UNC path. For instance Z: is usually a netwerkdrive which is mapped with "net use" or the gui arround "net use". I myself would advice an administrator to use the UNC path because the d

Re: Problem with output file on windows

>An windows user has told me that on its Windows XP psppire doesn't show its >output. I've asked him to >send me the values of HOMEPATH and HOMEDRIVE, and he send me this: >HOMEPATH = \ >HOMEDRIVE = z: I guess this is on a network. >So, on file-name.c, the final path is: z:// and I think windows

icons

Just a reminder. Some time ago Michel had some nice icons for the PSPP project. I myself think it would make the PSPP program have a more mature look if the same icons are used in the packages for different system. Is there a way to have them included in all the package builds for version 0.6.2 ?

Re: Re: PSPP on translationproject

Hi jacopo As far as I can see the easiest way to handle is to join the translationproject. This is easy not a burden. I am now a member of the dutch translation team with 1 assignment, PSPP. No big difference with the past for me and the benefit is that hopefully other team members can give me adv

Re: PSPP on translationproject

Hi all I succeeded in convincing the robot to accept the dutch translation for pspp-0.6.1-pre1. :-) (actually everything runs smooth and the robot gives good advice) Now the PSPP team can give it a try to fetch it and include it into this PSPP tarball version. Some questions/remarks: - is the PS

Re:

> Some of PSPP's translators have expressed interest in translating > GNU PSPP via translationproject.org.  I had a look around the > translationproject website and this sounds like a good idea to > me. Great. > The only thing that I don't see there is, how do I get my > project added?  So I'm wr

Re: Re: Subscribe PSPP to launchpad.net?

2009/6/17 : > > If the issue is just about obtaining getting a copy of the pspp.pot file, Nop. When using such a translator service, the translator sites needs the .pot file to validate the translation. Now the PSPP team has to verify translations again and again. No real burden if there is just

Re: Re: Subscribe PSPP to launchpad.net?

>john, Mon, 15 Jun 2009 23:08:29 +: >> However, for translators who want to use a public forum, and wish their >> contributions to be integrated into the Pspp distribution, I really >> would strongly suggest http://translationproject.org over any other. >> The reason is, that to my knowledge,

Re: Re: Issue with translation

Get the latest master. and then: msgmerge -o pt_BR.po-new pt_BR.po master/po/pspp.pot Also have a look at: http://jstover.motd.org/cgi-bin/oddmuse.cgi/Localization_and_Translations Have fun ___ pspp-dev mailing list pspp-dev@gnu.org http://lists.g

Re: [patch #6829] Tutorial documentation

Great. Would it be much work to generate weekly/monthly snapshots of the manual too? This gives the ability to reviews from more people. Maybe a lot of the current snapshots can be removed too. BTW. I think there are so much improvements in the current 0.6.1. release that releasing the stable ver

Re: Re: german translation

>It's probably best >to divide the task into chunks and work on it concurrently, >since there's about 1400 strings in total needing translation. If I may give an advice: Start with a quick look at the common used words. Decide with the german translation team how to translate these words. This to

Re: german translation and cluster analysis

> On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 06:51:05PM +0200, Markus Kempf wrote: > Hi, > > some month ago there were questions and emails about a german translation. >Is > still someone working on this topic? Is there an introduction how to >realize > such a location with po-files? (Is Kbabel a help

Update: Dutch translation for PSPP/PSPPIRE -=- Nederlandse vertaling voor PSPP/PSPPIRE

2009/4/25 unknown-1 : > An important note, the translations doesn't NOT work on the Cygwin > based MSWindows version yet. I don't have any idea why not. Hints are > welcome. If you, for the dutch translation, set LANG=nl in the environment settings,

Dutch translation for PSPP/PSPPIRE -=- Nederlandse vertaling voor PSPP/PSPPIRE

Today, 20090424, the dutch translation for PSPP/PSPPIRE is pushed into the masterbranch. New builds will include it and make the translation automatic available when the PC is configured for the use of dutch. Users using an older version of PSPP/PSPPIRE can find the translation and instructions of

Re: Pspp file icon

On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 12:08:14AM -0300, michel wrote: My uncle made an icon for the pspp files. I'm thinking about use it on windows, since so far there's no icons to be used. Do you like it? Bye, Michel I like it too. But in my opion, PSPP not only needs an icon fo

Re: location of psppire.txt

2009/2/17 John Darrington : > The problem was the renaming op the psppire.dll from psppire-0.dll to > psppire.dll. This is not necessary for the merge version, but still > needed for the stable version. > > That's interesting. I wonder what's different. No idea. Anyway. In the future

Re: location of psppire.txt

>Could the Windoze users apply this patch to the stable branch and >report on it? Unfortunately I get the error === (psppire:992): libglade-WARNING **: Could not load support for `psppire': No suc h file or directory (psppire:992): libglade-WARNING **: unknown widget class 'PsppireDia

Re: Localization and pspp on MSWindows

2009/2/13, John Darrington <>: > > On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 09:57:20AM +0100, unknown-1 wrote: <...> >Po files are source files. They are not installed, but are "compiled" >into .mo files which are installed into ${prefix}//LC_MESSAGES Right. I know, it see

Re: Localization and pspp on MSWindows

2009/2/8, John Darrington <>: > > One potential issue about i18n on non GNU systems: > > I was hoping to use the newlocale/uselocale functions, which are in > libc, but are absent from other systems (including mingw). I think > it's going to be very difficult to have more than marginal i18n > supp

Re: mingw and version 0.6.2

2009/2/7 Ben Pfaff <> > unknown-1 <> writes: > > > Very late with this, but I tested the commandline interface which is > available > > in the master and the merge version. It worked great. Is it possible to > push > > it to the stable version so I can

Re: Localization and pspp on MSWindows

2009/2/6, John Darrington <>: > > On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 10:10:42PM +0100, unknown-1 wrote: > <...> > I'm reasonably confident that we're using recoding characters > correctly. Me too as it works on Linux. > What I need is something so I can se

Localization and pspp on MSWindows

Hi I have a problem with the cygwin and the mingw based PSPP version. In both versions filenames with special characters like "ü" are a problem. File names are corrupted and in the mingw version labels to. Did succeed in putting them in the cygwin based installation. Further I didn't succeed in g

Re: Re: Stable 20090129 compiled to windows

Hi I couldn't resist and tried it. Unfortunately, it reports that the installation is finished and starts a black dosbox. Than the system crashes and reports a problem with gdk-pixbuf-query-loaders.exe Additional informations gives: === AppName: gdk-pixbuf-query-loaders.exe AppVer: 0.0.0.

mingw and version 0.6.2

Hi Very late with this, but I tested the commandline interface which is available in the master and the merge version. It worked great. Is it possible to push it to the stable version so I can be part of 0.6.2 ? MsWIndows users will love this addition. Further I see there is a lot of progress in

[patch #6742] Wish for GUI for settings

URL: Summary: Wish for GUI for settings Project: PSPP Submitted by: unknown_one Submitted on: Tue 03 Feb 2009 07:32:59 PM GMT Category: None Item Group: None

Re: Introduction

2009/2/1 Ben Pfaff < > > > > Dutch: > http://translate.google.nl/translate?hl=nl&sl=en&u=http://www.gnu.org/software/pspp/manual/html_node > > I think that you are fluent in Dutch. When you read the PSPP > manual in this way, does it make sense? Would it be useful to > someone who knows Dutch wel

Re: Introduction

>Angela Oppenheim writes: >>* I am an aspiring technical writer and was introduced to this* >>* list through Karl Barry and John Darrington. I hope to help* >>* with documentation on the PSPP project. * > >Hi Angela. I am glad to hear that you would like to help out >with PSPP documentation. W

Re: errors in snapshot merge-20090126 en 27

2009/1/30 Ben Pfaff <> > unknown-1 <> writes: > > This suggests that somehow q2c is generating corrupt > output. One source I've seen for that in other projects in the > past is a combination of missing dependencies (which would be a > bug in the PSPP makefile

Re: errors in snapshot merge-20090126 en 27

Hi Ben I checked it. Somehow, the files got corrupt on my disk. Don't no how yet. But the pspp-merge is ok. Have fun 2009/1/29 unknown-1 <> > Hi > > I just used > ./configure --infodir= > make > > And for the -20090125 versie everything worked fine

Re: errors in snapshot merge-20090126 en 27

1/29, Ben Pfaff < > > unknown-1 <> writes: > > > pspp-merge-20090126 > > > > src/language/tests/check-model.c:411:52: warning: missing terminating " > > character > > On line 411 of check-model.c, when I build from that snapshot, is: >

Re: errors in snapshot merge-20090126 en 27

es.c:863: error: missing terminating " character src/language/stats/frequencies.q:1525: error: expected declaration or statement at end of input src/language/stats/frequencies.q:1525: error: expected declaration or statement at end of input src/language/stats/frequencies.c:312: error: label 'los

dutch translation for PSPP/PSPPIRE

Hi I created a download page, http://pspp.awardspace.com/Translation, where a link to an evaluation copy of the dutch translation of PSPP/PSPPIRE can be found. Instructions for use are on this page. Unfortunately this doesn't work on MSWindows installations yet. I may self are not sure if such a

errors in snapshot merge-20090126 en 27

Hi Is it known the latest 2 merge snapshots give an error an make? Have fun ___ pspp-dev mailing list pspp-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-dev

Re: translations

2009/1/26, John Darrington > > > I am curieus, how do you generate the en_GB.gmo? > > I type "make" and everything just works for me. Just editing the .po file with an editor and that is it? "make" generates en_GB.gmo and "make install" installs it? (At this moment I can't reach my installat

Re: translations

KDE. Could this be the difference? Have fun 2009/1/25 John Darrington <> > On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 01:27:37AM +0100, unknown-1 wrote: > Hi > > Yes, and I see that make install tries to copy, but it is looking for > nl.gmo > not nl.mo. If nl.mo is copied to nl.

translations

Hi I am working at a dutch translation for the PSPP/PSPPIRE program. Strange enough it seems msgfmt or poedit transforms the .po to a .mo file. "make install" however expects a .gmo file. If I copy the .mo to .gmo it seems to work. Has anybody an idea - why .gmo is used and not .mo? - why .mo is g

Re: snapshots

Hi Make of Pspp-master runs fine now. And pspp-stable is generated again and compiles nice. Same problem or a coincidence? Anyway it is fixed. Have fun 2009/1/9 John Darrington <> > On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 09:21:45PM +0100, unknown-1 wrote: > Hi > > A make of pspp-

Re: snapshots

SE make runs without errors. Have fun 2009/1/9 Ben Pfaff > unknown-1 writes: > > > It is known that the merge and stable snapshots are not generated daily?? > > I need to fix that, I guess. > > The build logs are uploaded, so it's probably possible for anyone > to fin

snapshots

Hi It is known that the merge and stable snapshots are not generated daily?? And the last time I tried, the master didn't build. (Didn't have time to investigate, so maybe my fault) Have fun? ___ pspp-dev mailing list pspp-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.o

command line interface

Hi I looked at the commandline interface. Does this version now also support default configuration files? I suspect it is the same as for PSPP now. Right? I looked at the docs and couldn't find (or understand) information about the content of the configuration files. Did I overlook something or

Re: info request

> > > > > What is the difference between the master and the merge build? > > The "merge" build contains all the changes in both "master" and > "stable". The "master" build lacks the bug fixes from "stable". > So "merge" would be the most up to date for testing of future releases. > > The "merge

Snapshot updates for the windows (cygwin) builds

Hi I created a page with updates using the snapshots from Ben. The page is http://pspp.awardspace.com/Factory The updates are mainly intended for testing by experienced users. Have fun ___ pspp-dev mailing list pspp-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mail

info request

Hi Did the command line interface made it into the 20081108 build? If so which build? What is the difference between the master and the merge build? On 5-11 John mentioned: == The reliability command was added not so long ago, but it hasn't yet made it into any release. I suggest that

Re: problem when using the stable/merge verions on cygwin

Hi, The problem below seems to be an installation problem on 1 computer. Consider it as solved. Have fun 2008/11/7 unknown-1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Hi > > When I triy to compile the merge and the stable versions on cygwin I get > the next error: > > /us

Re: Re: pspp 0.6.1 to windows

Hi Typo, the missing dll is zlib1.dll. If the file is copied from an other installation and placed in the right directorie, psppire works. However, help doesn't work. Most likely this is a problem with Yelp. Solvable in the Mingw version? In the cygwin version not. Have fun _

problem when using the stable/merge verions on cygwin

Hi When I triy to compile the merge and the stable versions on cygwin I get the next error: /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/3.4.4/../../../../include/w32api/winsock2.h:635: err or: conflicting types for 'gethostname' /usr/include/sys/unistd.h:206: error: previous declaration of 'gethostna

Re: pspp 0.6.1 to windows

Hi When I try to use the mingw version I get a crash because zlib.1.dll is not found. I think in the download page of PSPP 'my' version could be better named 'PSPP on CYGWIN' which is the most important difference between the versions. Have fun ___ ps

Re: Fwd: a new factory build?

> It might take a few days to work out the kinks in the system, so > it's possible that some builds will get skipped, etc. > > It would be rather convenient if instead of a date, you named the > tarballs after their commit hash. Eg: > > pspp-47e6024280cbc95dbfa637009091cc8404c84fb0.tar.gz

(no subject)

>On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 10:39:29PM -0500, Martin Therrien-B?lec wrote: > But if I have windows, how I can try one of Ben's recent "master" >snapshots. > > And how I can install one of Ben's recent "master" snapshots??? > >See the file called INSTALL. For windows specific advice, it's >pr

Re: Fwd: a new factory build?

Thanks for the explanation. Actualy it worked on openSUSE after a second installation and a reboot. Have fun ___ pspp-dev mailing list pspp-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-dev

Re: Fwd: a new factory build?

> > On openSUSE the merge version gives at runtime the error: > > error while loading shared libraries: libpspp-0.7.0.so: cannot open > shared > object file: No such file or directory > > > You may need to run ldconfig after make install. Or if you're > installing to a non-standard loc

Re: Fwd: a new factory build?

Providing the latest nightly build would be the most convenient option for me. Thanx ___ pspp-dev mailing list pspp-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-dev

Re: Fwd: a new factory build?

Ben, Could you mail how I can create the stable and the merge version so I can check the fixes and see if the compilation reaches its end without errors. John, Was the openSUSE problem also fixed? Have fun ___ pspp-dev mailing list pspp-dev@gnu.org h

Fwd: a new factory build?

enSUSE and seems to work. Strange that there are more errors on Cygwin as on openSUSE. Hope this helps Have fun. 2008/10/29 Ben Pfaff > unknown-1 writes: > > > Maybe it is time for a new "factory", or whatever it is named build, so > users > > can test the lat

Re: Re: Writing journal and output file to current directory

> > > On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 10:22:47AM -0400, Jason Stover wrote: > I like the solution of installing in a user's folder. I didn't have much of an opinion about this until recently. I've been using PSPPIRE in some classroom demontstrations. It's very easy for me [...] It took me so

a new factory build?

Hi Ben Maybe it is time for a new "factory", or whatever it is named build, so users can test the latest fixes on there own risc. If there is a build with some naming convention I think I can find the time to create a update binary for mswindows so mswindows users can test this functionality. Ha

Re: criteria for version 1.0

2008/10/27, John Darrington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 11:19:29PM +0200, unknown-1 wrote: > > > > - a stable help feature with good help text (I have never been > able to > > see the current one working) > > > > H

Re: criteria for version 1.0

> > > > You can configure the directory used for Info files with the > --infodir option to the configure script. > -- Checked and works fine. Is it possible to change the configure script so it uses --infodir=/usr/share/info for openSUSE ? Have fun ___

Re: criteria for version 1.0

2008/10/26 unknown-1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >> (All PSPP does is the equivalent of typing the command >>yelp info:pspp >> in a shell. So if that fails for you, too, then it really cannot >> be a PSPP-related problem.) > > > Even yelp info:

Re: Re: criteria for version 1.0

2008/10/26 John Darrington > > - internationalization for the decimal > > I thought I fixed this problem? > In my eyes, partly. See the discussion in bug 24574. Have fun ___ pspp-dev mailing list pspp-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listin

Re: criteria for version 1.0

> > > Probably, we should convert the manual to HTML and use a web > browser, instead of using yelp. What about a additional help menu item "Reference Manual on the web" which points to http://www.gnu.org/software/pspp/manual/html_node/index.html ? This could give the time to think more about th

Re: criteria for version 1.0

> (All PSPP does is the equivalent of typing the command >yelp info:pspp > in a shell. So if that fails for you, too, then it really cannot > be a PSPP-related problem.) Even yelp info:pspp crashes with the same error. :-( I will have a further look at it soon. Have fun ___

Re: criteria for version 1.0

> > > - a stable help feature with good help text (I have never been > able to > > see the current one working) > > > > Have you described your problems here or filed a bug report? > > > > Yes, it is bug 23138 > > > > I just checked with the 0.6.1. on openSUSE 11. I get a Yelp > > err

Re: criteria for version 1.0

2008/10/25 Ben Pfaff > unknown-1 writes: > > > - a commandline interface to make it possible to use it the mswindows way > > I do not know what this means. Can you explain? Psppire should accept a filename as first commandline parameter. Bug 20606 > > - a stabl

Re: Re: criteria for version 1.0

>Jason Stover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>* On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 06:36:54AM +0800, John Darrington wrote:* >>*> That article by Andy Choens reminded me of another point.* >>*> * >>*> It would be really good if 1.0 came with a good user tutorial.* >>*> Unfortunately, I really don't know where

Re: Re: Writing journal and output file to current directory

Hi, Don't get me wrong. I didn't say that a program may not be installable in a users folder. but a program should be installable in every (reasonable) folder you choose. Installing it in a system folder and running it without administrator rights should be possible. I have no objections against y

Re: Re: Writing journal and output file to current directory

>If running a program sets the current directory to the program's >installation directory, then the natural question is: What is a >good default place to put PSPP's output files? Some points of view. Possible places: a) the temp directory b) the home directory c) the directory where the datafile i

Re: Re: Writing journal and output file to current directory

>The other solution would be install the program in the user folder, >but each user of the machine will need to install it. Trouble, trouble. This means every user has to update his installation individual. No administrator will be happy with that. This costs a fortune on a large network. >Becau

Re: possible workarounds for mingw setup

how many issues need a solution. It is still possible that he finds some unsolvable problem. Fortunately it looks as if all issues are solvable. And in potention the MinGW installation is better as the Cygwin installation. Let us see what happens. Have fun 2008/10/6 Ben Pfaff <> >

possible workarounds for mingw setup

Hi Michel, >The first is to fix the problem of it only works if unpacked on C:\msys, A partial work around could be if the installer patches the drive character in the installation. So an end user can, at install time, decide wether it is C:\msys D:\msys etc. Still no solution for networks etc, b

Re: Re: Possible Bug in Makefile

Hi Michel > Im compilling on my ubuntu using mingw and wine. The pspp.exe works with no > problems, What about making an windows installer for pspp.exe and make it available for download? Although pspp.exe can used on the cygwin installation, this might be easier to use. And I wonder if it has a

Pspp for windows 0.6.1-rc2

Hi I generated a windows update setup for version 0.6.1-rc2 without problems. It can be found on http://pspp.awardspace.com I did very limited testing with it! Have fun ___ pspp-dev mailing list pspp-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/p

Fwd: PSPP 0.6.1 pre-release

Nice to hear you appreciate the program and even the bit of work I did for it. Unfortunately I have no Mac and no knowledge of, I think, OSX. So I hope somebody will pickup the glove and makes a setup for the Mac. Have fun 2008/10/3 Carlos González Haro > Thank you for your work, it's great to h

Re: PSPP 0.6.1 pre-release

This pre-released compiled on Windows with Cygwin without problems. The update setup can be found on http://pspp.awardspace.com. Have fun ___ pspp-dev mailing list pspp-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-dev

Re: PSPP 0.6.1 pre-release

On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 09:08:29PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: >* I've made a PSPP 0.6.1 pre-release available at:* >* ftp://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/pspp/pspp-0.6.1-rc1.tar.gz* Hi Checked on openSUSE 11 64 bit. No problem found. . I changed http://jstover.motd.org/cgi-bin/oddmuse.cgi/openSUSE to t

Re: Bug Fix vs. Development Branch

I would support a bug and a development branch. Besides I would love if there was some strategie about alpha versions, release candidates etc. For the MS-Windows version not much users will be able to create there own binaries. Generating these binaries and publishing them will be a pain if questi

Re: Possible Bug

Hi James, To me it looks as if you didn't enter /usr/local/lib/pspp into the /etc/ld. so.conf file. This is mentioned during the make -install but hard to see. Have fun. ___ pspp-dev mailing list pspp-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/

Re: Unsupported feautures in mingw

e fun as sitting behind the computer. :-) So this will take some time before I can spend time again. But I still can use the Cygwin installation for upgrading the windows setup so it has no high priority. Have fun. 2008/7/6 Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > unknown-1 <[EMAIL P

  1   2   >