Hello all!
Any remarks regarding the latest Pro Tools release?
Best! / Martin
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@
Hi,
You need to set the input of the AUX track to a bus and then use the sends on
the audio track to send the audio to the reverb.
The send must point at the same bus as the input of the AUX track.
In the sends window, you can choose how much of the audio you want to send to
the reverb, the mor
Hello Slau!
Control+F does the same like the other tried key combinations, nothing.
Maybe I did something wrong?
1. I imported the following macro groups:
Content Missing and Missing Samples Dialogs Macros,
Display Palette for Content Missing Dialog,
Kontakt 5 plug-in
Hi Martin,
Start over, delete what you have and don't import all of those groups. In the
Drop Box, I've deleted what's not necessary. Import the stand-alone and plug-in
macro groups plus the one macro group that includes both Content Missing and
Missing Samples in the name. Don't import and lat
Hello Slau!
I did everyting like you suggested.
Still no success and silence.
Is there anything for testing if the macros are running?
Do I have to rename anything from Kontakt5 to Kontakt6 in the macro syntax?
Best! / Martin
> -Original Message-
> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto
Does the stand-alone version work for you?
> On Nov 1, 2019, at 11:42 AM, Martin (Punky) Sopart wrote:
>
> Hello Slau!
>
> I did everyting like you suggested.
> Still no success and silence.
>
> Is there anything for testing if the macros are running?
> Do I have to rename anything from Konta
Niklas,
The way you describe this, wouldn't that also send the dry signal from
the audio track? What if you only wanted to send the trail effects of
the verb, but nothing more. You only wanted to send wet, not dry? Is
that where you change the send on the audio track to prefader instead of
p
If I am not mistaken starting in Pro Tools 9 you could just create an AUX
track, it automatically does the bus routing for you now. But you want to route
the two audio tracks to the AUX tracks and not the other way around. Also
PreFader means that the track is sent to the AUX track before the tr
So, what is the difference in using a send on an audio track, sending to
an AUX track, then letting PT do the routing, vs. setting your output IO
of an audio track to a bus, then going to an AUX track, and setting the
input to that same bus, and leaving, on the AUX track, your output IO
set to
When you use a send, you ae sending a copy of the audio signal So in essence
you are creating a wet/dry blend. This is useful for things like reverb and
delays or other time based effects. When you put the reverb or delay on the
aux track, you will want to set it to be 100% wet. Then the send l
Hi guys:
I did what yo'll told me to do and I can't still hear the reverb. This
is what I have:
a track Connection, another called Radio Effect, and the Aux called Group Verb.
I routed sends oA of Connections and Radio Effect to Group Verb.
Then I go into sends A of Group Verb, VO space on it to o
11 matches
Mail list logo
