Did anyone ever work this out with Avid to see a server-based license server will work with Pro Tools?
On Monday, December 5, 2016 at 4:09:33 PM UTC-5, Gord wrote: > > That is good. I'll have to try it out > with ivory and see if it works while the mac is running. > Gord > > -----Original Message----- > From: Slau Halatyn > Sent: Monday, December 5, 2016 9:21 AM > To: ptac...@googlegroups.com <javascript:> > Subject: Re: future network authorization for iLok License Manager > > Hi Gord, > I guess as long as one computer is acting as the iLok license server and > both computers are on the same network, yes, that's the idea. Sounds good, > eh? ;) > Slau > > > On Nov 28, 2016, at 12:30 AM, Gordon Kent <dbm...@cybernex.net > <javascript:>> wrote: > > > > Does this mean that I can have my iLok > > connected to my mac running pro tools, but as long as my mac is up and > > running I could run something like ivory on my PC without having to > > disconnect the ilok from the mac and plug it into the windows machine. > > That is something I would use because I still go back and forth between > > pro tools and Sonar from time to time. > > Gord > > > > -----Original Message----- From: Slau Halatyn > > Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2016 9:08 AM > > To: ptac...@googlegroups.com <javascript:> > > Subject: future network authorization for iLok License Manager > > > > Those who have carefully read through the iLok License Manager manual > > might have noticed a reference to network authorization. This was > > introduced a while ago but only pertained to site licenses. Pace has > made > > some changes to accommodate single-user network authorization. If you've > > recently upgraded to Pro Tools 12.6, you might have noticed a message > from > > iLok License Manager regarding network authorization. It requires you to > > have one computer always acting as a server. Providing that machine is > on > > and you're connected to it either locally or via VPN, you can run Pro > > Tools on a remote computer without an iLok present. To be clear, you > > don't have to use this feature and most people will simply continue to > use > > the iLok exactly as it has worked all along. This is just another option > > for authorization. Just so the users here know, that section of the iLok > > License Manager that requires setup for such network authorization is > not > > yet accessible and Pace is naturally aware of this and, as in the past, > > I'm working with them to eventually make it accessible. Pace has > > demonstrated their commitment to accessibility so I'm personally not > > concerned that upon its roll-out, this feature is not yet ready for > setup > > using a screen reader. At this point, it looks like it should be ready > > some time around the end of the year. Just an FYI. > > Slau > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > an > > email to ptaccess+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > an > > email to ptaccess+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
