Re: RX 5 Izotope Accessibility

Have any of you worked with the batch processing module? On Monday, May 9, 2016 at 3:47:05 PM UTC-4, Abigail Lanier wrote: > > Hi All, > > This is my first time posting, but i've been quietly monitoring the group > for a number of years now. > > > I'm interested in what success anyone has had

Re: RX 5 Izotope Accessibility

Hi Abagail. I don't have an answer for you, but iZotope were very kean on making their products accessible to screen readers at one time. oZone is quite accessible and I believe they implemented some accessibility support in RX as well. This was several years ago though. What you could do is

Re: RX 5 Izotope Accessibility

Hi Abigail, Hope all's well. Nice to see you on the list. The stand-alone version of RX5 is usable but it's somewhat clumsy. Most of all, I find the selection of ranges of audio to be the biggest obstacle. If you're processing entire files, it's not an issue but, for sections of audio within a

Re: RX 5 Izotope Accessibility

Thanks for your feedback. > On May 9, 2016, at 4:22 PM, TheOreoMonster wrote: > > Sorry i can’t speak to 5 as i am still on 4 but if the interface hasn’t > changed to much you should still be able to do some clean up work. The > problem is probably with more

Re: RX 5 Izotope Accessibility

Sorry i can’t speak to 5 as i am still on 4 but if the interface hasn’t changed to much you should still be able to do some clean up work. The problem is probably with more difficult things given that we can’t really use the spetograph but should still be able to get a lot done. I’ll see if i

RX 5 Izotope Accessibility

Hi All, This is my first time posting, but i've been quietly monitoring the group for a number of years now. I'm interested in what success anyone has had with Izotope Rx5 as a stand alone program with VO. I'm working to use it to remove background noise on voiceover files. A tutorial would