On Thu, Aug 29, 2002, Peter Farmer wrote:
> > I also sent email directly to Ralf, and heard no response from that
> > either.
> [...]
> > As things stand, I can't help but form the grudging opionion that pth is
> > being squatted on.
> [...]
I know your patience is horribly stretched here. Sorry
On Thu, 29 Aug 2002 00:19, you wrote:
>
> I also sent email directly to Ralf, and heard no response from that
> either.
>
> As things stand, I can't help but form the grudging opionion that pth is
> being squatted on. Pretending to maintain a project without actually doing
> so is worse than doin
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 01:59:21PM -0700, Archie Cobbs wrote:
> Jason Evans wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 08:29:53PM +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> > > In case there are still any problems and/or patches around
> > > we still have not included into the CVS state of Pth (see
> > > http://
Jason Evans wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 08:29:53PM +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> > In case there are still any problems and/or patches around
> > we still have not included into the CVS state of Pth (see
> > http://cvs.ossp.org/pkg/lib/pth/), please do not hesitate to repost them
> > he
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002 02:29, you wrote:
> Pth is both part of the GNU and the OSSP project (where it is physically
> located and developed). Unfortunately it seems that I've written too
> much software over the last years ;), because there are lots of
On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 08:29:53PM +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
>
> In case there are still any problems and/or patches around
> we still have not included into the CVS state of Pth (see
> http://cvs.ossp.org/pkg/lib/pth/), please do not hesitate to repost them
> here again. Perhaps they wer
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> I've been subscribed to this list for several weeks now, and have seen no
> indication that someone is actually maintaining pth. There have been at
> least 4 bug reports, 3 of which included fixes. I'd like to know if
> someone is keeping track of al
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I am a pth list lurker - I need pth to support posix threaded apps on various
unix platforms.
I think Ralf has written _lots_ of excellent software . I, for one, cant
complain if he has a high latency on responding to peoples problems. So I
g
David Schwartz wrote:
> >I've been subscribed to this list for several weeks now, and have seen no
> >indication that someone is actually maintaining pth. There have been at
> >least 4 bug reports, 3 of which included fixes. I'd like to know if
> >someone is keeping track of all the fixes people
On Mon, 29 Jul 2002 13:44:48 -0700, Jason Evans wrote:
>I've been subscribed to this list for several weeks now, and have seen no
>indication that someone is actually maintaining pth. There have been at
>least 4 bug reports, 3 of which included fixes. I'd like to know if
>someone is keeping tr
Jason Evans wrote:
> I've been subscribed to this list for several weeks now, and have seen no
> indication that someone is actually maintaining pth. There have been at
> least 4 bug reports, 3 of which included fixes. I'd like to know if
> someone is keeping track of all the fixes people are pr
I've been subscribed to this list for several weeks now, and have seen no
indication that someone is actually maintaining pth. There have been at
least 4 bug reports, 3 of which included fixes. I'd like to know if
someone is keeping track of all the fixes people are providing, since I
recently a
12 matches
Mail list logo
