On Mon, 30 Jan 2006, Kevin Ruland wrote:
Bertram,
Things like static type checking may be optional (to the workflow) in
the sense that one could still execute a workflow without having done
the static type checking step or perhaps the workflow could be executed
if static type checking
the effort of
annotating them correctly. In retrospect, I should not have spoken
because I don't know what the desired functionality of this portion of
the system is.
Kevin
Shawn Bowers wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006, Kevin Ruland wrote:
Bertram,
Things like static type checking may
