Juergen Beisert wrote:
> Gary,
>
> On Dienstag, 11. November 2008, Gary Thomas wrote:
>> Index: rules/canutils.in
>> ===
>> --- rules/canutils.in (revision 9080)
>> +++ rules/canutils.in (working copy)
>> @@ -2,7 +2,6 @@
>> menuc
Gary Thomas wrote:
> Wolfram Sang wrote:
>> Hello Gary,
>>
>>> Assume that I have a totally local kernel tree - how can I use
>>> this? Also assume that I don't [necessarily] need/want ptxdist
>>> to bother building my kernel.
>>>
>>> How can I configure things to work in this way?
>> The current
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 07:40:58AM -0700, Gary Thomas wrote:
> Close, but I'm still fuzzy on a couple of details.
>
> * Why not just specify the whole kernel source path, rather than
> the [obscure in my mind] prefix + version. I have kernel source
> trees all over the place and having to rerun
Gary,
On Dienstag, 11. November 2008, Gary Thomas wrote:
> Juergen Beisert wrote:
> > On Dienstag, 11. November 2008, Gary Thomas wrote:
> >> Index: rules/canutils.in
> >> ===
> >> --- rules/canutils.in (revision 9080)
> >> +++ rule
Juergen Beisert wrote:
> Gary,
>
> On Dienstag, 11. November 2008, Gary Thomas wrote:
>> Juergen Beisert wrote:
>>> On Dienstag, 11. November 2008, Gary Thomas wrote:
Index: rules/canutils.in
===
--- rules/canutils.in
I'm trying to build the CAN utilities package and having trouble.
Firstly, it seems to expect the [berlios.de] SocketCAN include
tree, but nothing in the configuration points at that.
Also, programs which are not selected by the configuration are
still built, just not installed.
Most particularl
Gary,
On Dienstag, 11. November 2008, Gary Thomas wrote:
> Index: rules/canutils.in
> ===
> --- rules/canutils.in (revision 9080)
> +++ rules/canutils.in (working copy)
> @@ -2,7 +2,6 @@
> menuconfig CANUTILS
> tristate
>
Gary Thomas wrote:
> I'm trying to build the CAN utilities package and having trouble.
>
> Firstly, it seems to expect the [berlios.de] SocketCAN include
> tree, but nothing in the configuration points at that.
>
> Also, programs which are not selected by the configuration are
> still built, just
Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 07:40:58AM -0700, Gary Thomas wrote:
>
>> Close, but I'm still fuzzy on a couple of details.
>>
>> * Why not just specify the whole kernel source path, rather than
>> the [obscure in my mind] prefix + version. I have kernel source
>> trees all over th
Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Hello Gary,
>
>> Assume that I have a totally local kernel tree - how can I use
>> this? Also assume that I don't [necessarily] need/want ptxdist
>> to bother building my kernel.
>>
>> How can I configure things to work in this way?
>
> The current state of local kernel tre
Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> Gary Thomas wrote:
>> I'm trying to build the CAN utilities package and having trouble.
>>
>> Firstly, it seems to expect the [berlios.de] SocketCAN include
>> tree, but nothing in the configuration points at that.
>>
>> Also, programs which are not selected by the config
Hello Gary,
> Assume that I have a totally local kernel tree - how can I use
> this? Also assume that I don't [necessarily] need/want ptxdist
> to bother building my kernel.
>
> How can I configure things to work in this way?
The current state of local kernel trees looks like this:
Assuming we
12 matches
Mail list logo