Hi Matthias,
On Monday 28 September 2015 16:40:41 Matthias Klein wrote:
> thanks a lot for the tip!
> I compared the files (by hand/eyes), but overlooked the "plus"...
:)
> Should I send a patch?
The patch is already in ptxdist-master since a few minutes...
Regards,
Juergen
--
Pengutronix e.
Hello Juergen,
thanks a lot for the tip!
I compared the files (by hand/eyes), but overlooked the "plus"...
Should I send a patch?
Best regards,
Matthias
-- Originalnachricht --
Von: "Juergen Borleis"
An: ptxdist@pengutronix.de; "Matthias Klein"
Gesendet: 28.09.2015 16:07:36
Betr
Hi Matthias,
On Monday 28 September 2015 15:35:59 Matthias Klein wrote:
> I tried to update our BSP to ptxdist-2015.09.0 and now we are missing
> the "/dev/disk/by-path/" directory.
> I found that the file "60-persistent-storage.rules" is missing. (We are
> using legacy udev and not systemd.)
>
>
Hello,
I tried to update our BSP to ptxdist-2015.09.0 and now we are missing
the "/dev/disk/by-path/" directory.
I found that the file "60-persistent-storage.rules" is missing. (We are
using legacy udev and not systemd.)
The file 60-persistent-storage.rules is in the
platform-xxx/packages/u
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 09:39:40AM +0200, Moritz Warning wrote:
> I have a package that, when selected, should add a variable to a
> bunch of other packages.
>
> Is this possible?
What kind of variables? kconfig? make variables to influence the building
the package?
You can always access all
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 01:25:42PM +, Alan Martinović wrote:
> Hi there,
> I'm having problems identifying how to successfully fail an install of a
> custom package in the postinst script.
>
> I have a dummy postinst script that exits with non zero.
> I would expect that, given that there wa
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 12:30:41PM +0200, Ladislav Michl wrote:
> Hi there!
>
>
> PTXCONF_GLIBC_VERSION is used for check for specific toolchain. However when
> left
> blank, compilation fails with:
> ---
> target: glibc.targetinstall
> ---
>
> pt
