[ptxdist] Busybox Config.in

2016-01-03 Thread Hardik A Gohil (WMSC-HW)
Hello all, I am working on ptxdist-2013.01.0. I added a new command into the busybox miscutils folder. Also copied the /usr/local/lib/ptxdist-/rules/busybox.in to /phyCORE-AM335x-PD13.1.2/rules directory. In busybox.in file the line source "config/busybox/Config.in".where to add config/busybox

[ptxdist] [PATCH] dosfstools: fix url and update to 3.0.28

2016-01-03 Thread Ladislav Michl
Dosfstools moved to github. Once there, update to version 3.0.28 Signed-off-by: Ladislav Michl --- dosfstools.make |6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/rules/dosfstools.make b/rules/dosfstools.make index 70d8237..4d77a63 100644 ---

Re: [ptxdist] Future plans for uClibc-ng?

2016-01-03 Thread Bryan Hundven
Robert, On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 10:27:26AM +0100, Robert Schwebel wrote: > On Sat, Jan 02, 2016 at 06:02:37PM -0800, Bryan Hundven wrote: > > > > I'm curious to know if ptxdist/OSELAS.Toolchain plans to support > > > > uClibc-ng in the future? > > > > > > > > http://www.uclibc-ng.org/ > > > > >

Re: [ptxdist] Future plans for uClibc-ng?

2016-01-03 Thread Ladislav Michl
On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 10:27:52AM +0100, Alexander Dahl wrote: > Hei hei, > > On Sat, Jan 02, 2016 at 10:49:49PM +0100, Ladislav Michl wrote: > > But are there any active uClibc users? > > Do you mean in general or specifically with ptxdist? As far as ptxdist > is concerned, we considered it

Re: [ptxdist] Future plans for uClibc-ng?

2016-01-03 Thread Alexander Dahl
Hei hei, On Sat, Jan 02, 2016 at 10:49:49PM +0100, Ladislav Michl wrote: > But are there any active uClibc users? Do you mean in general or specifically with ptxdist? As far as ptxdist is concerned, we considered it once for a project with very few RAM, but didn't have time to evaluate it then.

Re: [ptxdist] Future plans for uClibc-ng?

2016-01-03 Thread Robert Schwebel
On Sat, Jan 02, 2016 at 06:02:37PM -0800, Bryan Hundven wrote: > > > I'm curious to know if ptxdist/OSELAS.Toolchain plans to support > > > uClibc-ng in the future? > > > > > > http://www.uclibc-ng.org/ > > > > with half a year without commit to uClib git I'm considering it a dead > > project (I