this fixes migrate on systems where sed is not in /bin/ (e.g. OS X).
Signed-off-by: Michael Olbrich
---
Hi,
what about this? It's less invasive than using autoconf.
mol
scripts/libptxdist.sh |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/scripts/libptxdist.sh b/s
Dear Michael,
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 18:04:56 +0200, Michael Olbrich wrote:
this fixes migrate on systems where sed is not in /bin/ (e.g. OS X).
Signed-off-by: Michael Olbrich
---
Hi,
what about this? It's less invasive than using autoconf.
Well, your solution fixes my problem with sed in she
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 12:16:09PM +0200, andr...@biessmann.de wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 18:04:56 +0200, Michael Olbrich wrote:
> >this fixes migrate on systems where sed is not in /bin/ (e.g. OS X).
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Michael Olbrich
> >---
> >
> >Hi,
> >
> >what about this? It's less
Hi,
* Michael Olbrich [2011-10-14 16:04]:
> Hmmm, I just had another idea: How about fixing the environment in ptxdist:
>
> mkdir /
> ln -s @PYTHON@ /python
> ln -s @SED@ /sed
> [...]
> export PATH=:$PATH
> [...]
>
> just do this as early as possible in ptxdist and PATH will provide the
> corre
Dear Michael,
On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 16:04:34 +0200, Michael Olbrich wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 12:16:09PM +0200, andr...@biessmann.de wrote:
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 18:04:56 +0200, Michael Olbrich wrote:
I've been thinking about this for some time. I don't like
preprocessing a
lot of f
On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 08:54:04 +0200, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
Dear Michael,
On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 16:04:34 +0200, Michael Olbrich wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 12:16:09PM +0200, andr...@biessmann.de
wrote:
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 18:04:56 +0200, Michael Olbrich wrote:
So how about naming
Dear Bernhard,
On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 17:03:43 +0200, Bernhard Walle wrote:
Hi,
* Michael Olbrich [2011-10-14 16:04]:
Hmmm, I just had another idea: How about fixing the environment in
ptxdist:
mkdir /
ln -s @PYTHON@ /python
ln -s @SED@ /sed
[...]
export PATH=:$PATH
[...]
just do this as earl
* Andreas Bießmann [2011-10-17 09:06]:
>
> >It's not really nice, but I think it's better than patching lots of
> >tools. And having scripts as executable programs is IMO still better
> >than having to call the interpreter manually (which is necessary with
> >your $PTXDIST_SED approach.
>
> But
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 12:45:26PM +0200, Bernhard Walle wrote:
> * Andreas Bießmann [2011-10-17 09:06]:
> >
> > >It's not really nice, but I think it's better than patching lots of
> > >tools. And having scripts as executable programs is IMO still better
> > >than having to call the interpreter