The "customized udev rules" are installed via install_alternative_tree and thus,
both paths are "/usr/lib/udev/rules.d".
Reported-by: Joerg Epping
Signed-off-by: Juergen Borleis
---
rules/udev.in | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/rules/udev.in b/rules/udev.in
i
As a virtual package, udev should not infer any dependencies of the
concrete implementation. Also, both systemd and udev-legacy already
select host-gperf on their own.
Signed-off-by: Roland Hieber
---
rules/udev.in | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/rules/udev.in b/rules/udev.in
On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 05:57:50PM +0100, Michael Olbrich wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 09:47:37AM +0100, Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia wrote:
> > El dom., 12 ene. 2020 a las 13:52, Michael Olbrich
> > () escribió:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 07:55:36PM +0100, Guillermo Rodríguez wrote:
> >
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 09:47:37AM +0100, Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia wrote:
> El dom., 12 ene. 2020 a las 13:52, Michael Olbrich
> () escribió:
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 07:55:36PM +0100, Guillermo Rodríguez wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Guillermo Rodriguez
> > > ---
> > > .../0003-include-sy
El dom., 12 ene. 2020 a las 13:52, Michael Olbrich
() escribió:
>
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 07:55:36PM +0100, Guillermo Rodríguez wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Guillermo Rodriguez
> > ---
> > .../0003-include-sysmacros-for-new-glibc.patch | 17 +
> > patches/udev-182/series
On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 07:55:36PM +0100, Guillermo Rodríguez wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Guillermo Rodriguez
> ---
> .../0003-include-sysmacros-for-new-glibc.patch | 17 +
> patches/udev-182/series | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+)
> create mode 10
Signed-off-by: Guillermo Rodriguez
---
.../0003-include-sysmacros-for-new-glibc.patch | 17 +
patches/udev-182/series | 1 +
2 files changed, 18 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 patches/udev-182/0003-include-sysmacros-for-new-glibc.patch
diff --git a/pa
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 04:32:19PM +0200, Markus Niebel wrote:
> From: Markus Niebel
>
> mtd-probe does not compile. Fix this by adding stdint to supply
> correct typedefs
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Niebel
Thanks, applied,
Michael
> ---
> .../udev-182/0002-mtd-probe-fix-compilation.patch |
From: Markus Niebel
mtd-probe does not compile. Fix this by adding stdint to supply
correct typedefs
Signed-off-by: Markus Niebel
---
.../udev-182/0002-mtd-probe-fix-compilation.patch | 25 ++
patches/udev-182/series| 4 +---
2 files changed, 2
'udevadm trigger' was being called without parameters in the
udev init script. This is equivalent to --action=change, which
means that udev rules for the "add" action would not be
triggered. Fix this by explicitly passing --action=add to
udevadm trigger.
Signed-off-by: Guillermo Rodriguez
---
pr
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 03:07:45PM +0100, Clemens Gruber wrote:
> This was broken since commit 7732f73 and custom rule files were not
> copied.
Good catch. Thanks, applied.
Michael
>
> Signed-off-by: Clemens Gruber
> ---
> rules/udev.make | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions
This was broken since commit 7732f73 and custom rule files were not
copied.
Signed-off-by: Clemens Gruber
---
rules/udev.make | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/rules/udev.make b/rules/udev.make
index bd3c3ad..aeba9e5 100644
--- a/rules/udev.make
+++ b/rules/ud
On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 10:07:42AM +0200, Michael Olbrich wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 04:18:00PM +0200, Clemens Gruber wrote:
> > Current kernel docs recommend disabling CONFIG_UEVENT_HELPER.
> >
> > If disabled however, the following error message is shown:
> > /etc/rc.d/S00udev: line 95: ca
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 04:18:00PM +0200, Clemens Gruber wrote:
> Current kernel docs recommend disabling CONFIG_UEVENT_HELPER.
>
> If disabled however, the following error message is shown:
> /etc/rc.d/S00udev: line 95: can't create /proc/sys/kernel/hotplug:
> nonexistent directory
>
> This patc
Current kernel docs recommend disabling CONFIG_UEVENT_HELPER.
If disabled however, the following error message is shown:
/etc/rc.d/S00udev: line 95: can't create /proc/sys/kernel/hotplug:
nonexistent directory
This patch fixes it by checking if /proc/sys/kernel/hotplug exists.
Signed-off-by: Cle
Hello Jürgen,
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 10:39:04AM +0100, Jürgen Beisert wrote:
> udev: standalone variant fails to build with newer toolchains
>
> udev cannot be linked due to the use of the 'mq_getattr' call which requires
> librt to link successfully.
>
> The configure script already ch
udev: standalone variant fails to build with newer toolchains
udev cannot be linked due to the use of the 'mq_getattr' call which requires
librt to link successfully.
The configure script already checks for "clock_gettime" in order to add librt
to the list of required libraries. This is v
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 09:17:02AM +0200, Bernhard Walle wrote:
> Am 16.08.2011 15:56, schrieb Michael Olbrich:
> > On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 07:34:58PM +0200, bernh...@bwalle.de wrote:
> >> From: Bernhard Walle
> >>
> >> When a toolchain without kernel headers (such as the Lite version from
> >> Co
Am 16.08.2011 15:56, schrieb Michael Olbrich:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 07:34:58PM +0200, bernh...@bwalle.de wrote:
>> From: Bernhard Walle
>>
>> When a toolchain without kernel headers (such as the Lite version from
>> Codesourcery) or with very old kernel header is used, udev doesn't build
>> be
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 07:34:58PM +0200, bernh...@bwalle.de wrote:
> From: Bernhard Walle
>
> When a toolchain without kernel headers (such as the Lite version from
> Codesourcery) or with very old kernel header is used, udev doesn't build
> because videodev.h is missing.
>
> This patch adds th
From: Bernhard Walle
When a toolchain without kernel headers (such as the Lite version from
Codesourcery) or with very old kernel header is used, udev doesn't build
because videodev.h is missing.
This patch adds the $(KERNEL_HEADERS_INCLUDE_DIR) to the include path of
udev like it's done for bus
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 04:18:50PM -0400, Jon Ringle wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Robert Schwebel
> wrote:
> > For the non-experimental udev version, this isn't defined, so it gets
> > the non-existing configure option, which ends up with an error. Fixed in
> > ptxdist master.
>
> Ye
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Robert Schwebel
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Michael applied this patch, but it has an issue:
>
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 09:16:35PM -0400, Jon Ringle wrote:
>> --disable-action_modeswitch is needed when UDEV_EXPERIMENTAL is not defined
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jon Ringle
>> ---
Hi,
Michael applied this patch, but it has an issue:
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 09:16:35PM -0400, Jon Ringle wrote:
> --disable-action_modeswitch is needed when UDEV_EXPERIMENTAL is not defined
>
> Signed-off-by: Jon Ringle
> ---
> rules/udev.in |8
> rules/udev.make | 12 +++
--disable-action_modeswitch is needed when UDEV_EXPERIMENTAL is not defined
Signed-off-by: Jon Ringle
---
rules/udev.in |8
rules/udev.make | 12
2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/rules/udev.in b/rules/udev.in
index 089a8f5..27fb3c3 100
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 01:44:53PM +0200, Carsten Schlote wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > The drivers rule in udev can cause quite some trouble in runtime.
> > Especially for busses relying on platform devices it sometimes leads
> to
> > ...
>
> This might be true for some people's hardware. For our hardware
Hi,
> The drivers rule in udev can cause quite some trouble in runtime.
> Especially for busses relying on platform devices it sometimes leads
to
> ...
This might be true for some people's hardware. For our hardware I
carefully design things in a way, which allows for auto-detection and
probing.
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 03:49:05PM +0200, Carsten Schlote wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the attached patch adds the drivers udev rules to the udev install stage
> again. It also adds some entry to udev.in to control installation
> behaviour.
>
> For those keeping their ptxdist in sync with 'trunk', this
Hi,
the attached patch adds the drivers udev rules to the udev install stage
again. It also adds some entry to udev.in to control installation
behaviour.
For those keeping their ptxdist in sync with 'trunk', this option will
appear the next time you call 'ptxdist oldconfig' after merging-in the
Fine by me ;-), and yes - a macro would be the right solution. I'll put
it on my to do list but I can't promise I'll find the time right away.
Bo
Robert Schwebel wrote:
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 12:22:52PM +0200, Juergen Beisert wrote:
On Mittwoch, 8. April 2009, Robert Schwebel wrote:
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 12:22:52PM +0200, Juergen Beisert wrote:
> On Mittwoch, 8. April 2009, Robert Schwebel wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 11:15:12AM +0200, Juergen Beisert wrote:
> > > On Mittwoch, 8. April 2009, Bo Hansen wrote:
> > > > Fix when copying custom udev rules for revision 10270
On Mittwoch, 8. April 2009, Robert Schwebel wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 11:15:12AM +0200, Juergen Beisert wrote:
> > On Mittwoch, 8. April 2009, Bo Hansen wrote:
> > > Fix when copying custom udev rules for revision 10270.
> >
> > There are many locations in ptxdist where the content of a dire
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 11:15:12AM +0200, Juergen Beisert wrote:
> On Mittwoch, 8. April 2009, Bo Hansen wrote:
> > Fix when copying custom udev rules for revision 10270.
>
> There are many locations in ptxdist where the content of a directory
> will be installed in such a way. So I think, this isn
On Mittwoch, 8. April 2009, Bo Hansen wrote:
> Fix when copying custom udev rules for revision 10270.
There are many locations in ptxdist where the content of a directory will be
installed in such a way. So I think, this isn't the correct solution.
Marc? Robert? What do you think?
jbe
--
Peng
Fix when copying custom udev rules for revision 10270.
Best regards,
Bo
Adds check if file is really a file or a directory
when copying custom rules for udev. This was a
problem when using CVS which creates a directory.
signed-off-by: b...@newtec.dk
--- rules/udev.make 2009-04-07 20:12:18.00
35 matches
Mail list logo
