On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 12:21:14PM +, Baeuerle, Florian wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 12.10.2018, 14:01 +0200 schrieb Michael Olbrich:
> > On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 02:19:17PM +, Baeuerle, Florian wrote:
> > > Inject fake timestamps into the build via faketime to produce the exact
> > > same binar
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 02:27:05PM +, Baeuerle, Florian wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 16.10.2018, 14:38 +0200 schrieb Michael Olbrich:
> > On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 10:57:20AM +, Baeuerle, Florian wrote:
> > > Am Dienstag, den 16.10.2018, 12:09 +0200 schrieb Michael Olbrich:
> > > > On Thu, Oct 1
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 07:15:37PM +0200, Alexander Dahl wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 10:57:20AM +, Baeuerle, Florian wrote:
> > SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH uses the ptxdist release number for the timestamp, thus
> > the
> > timestamp changes with every ptxdist release. I'd prefer to *really* get th
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 02:11:52PM +, Baeuerle, Florian wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 16.10.2018, 14:51 +0200 schrieb Michael Olbrich:
> > On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 11:06:19AM +, Baeuerle, Florian wrote:
> > > Am Dienstag, den 16.10.2018, 10:59 +0200 schrieb Michael Olbrich:
> > > > On Fri, Oct 1
Hello Florian,
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 10:57:20AM +, Baeuerle, Florian wrote:
> SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH uses the ptxdist release number for the timestamp, thus the
> timestamp changes with every ptxdist release. I'd prefer to *really* get the
> same binary when the source code was not changed at all
Am Dienstag, den 16.10.2018, 14:38 +0200 schrieb Michael Olbrich:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 10:57:20AM +, Baeuerle, Florian wrote:
> > Hi Michael,
> >
> > Am Dienstag, den 16.10.2018, 12:09 +0200 schrieb Michael Olbrich:
> > > On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 02:19:17PM +, Baeuerle, Florian wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 16.10.2018, 14:51 +0200 schrieb Michael Olbrich:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 11:06:19AM +, Baeuerle, Florian wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, den 16.10.2018, 10:59 +0200 schrieb Michael Olbrich:
> > > On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 12:28:19PM +, Baeuerle, Florian wrote:
> > > > Am Freitag, d
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 11:06:19AM +, Baeuerle, Florian wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 16.10.2018, 10:59 +0200 schrieb Michael Olbrich:
> > On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 12:28:19PM +, Baeuerle, Florian wrote:
> > > Am Freitag, den 12.10.2018, 14:01 +0200 schrieb Michael Olbrich:
> > > > On Thu, Oct 11
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 10:57:20AM +, Baeuerle, Florian wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> Am Dienstag, den 16.10.2018, 12:09 +0200 schrieb Michael Olbrich:
> > On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 02:19:17PM +, Baeuerle, Florian wrote:
> > > Inject fake timestamps into the build via faketime to produce the exac
Am Dienstag, den 16.10.2018, 10:59 +0200 schrieb Michael Olbrich:
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 12:28:19PM +, Baeuerle, Florian wrote:
> > Am Freitag, den 12.10.2018, 14:01 +0200 schrieb Michael Olbrich:
> > > On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 02:19:17PM +, Baeuerle, Florian wrote:
> > > > Inject fake ti
Hi Michael,
Am Dienstag, den 16.10.2018, 12:09 +0200 schrieb Michael Olbrich:
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 02:19:17PM +, Baeuerle, Florian wrote:
> > Inject fake timestamps into the build via faketime to produce the exact
> > same binaries.
>
> I'd like to see this patch split in two.
> One to h
On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 02:19:17PM +, Baeuerle, Florian wrote:
> Inject fake timestamps into the build via faketime to produce the exact
> same binaries.
I'd like to see this patch split in two.
One to handle the KBUILD_BUILD_ stuff. That should be done like the kernel
with the symlink magic,
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 12:28:19PM +, Baeuerle, Florian wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 12.10.2018, 14:01 +0200 schrieb Michael Olbrich:
> > On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 02:19:17PM +, Baeuerle, Florian wrote:
> > > Inject fake timestamps into the build via faketime to produce the exact
> > > same binar
Am Freitag, den 12.10.2018, 14:01 +0200 schrieb Michael Olbrich:
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 02:19:17PM +, Baeuerle, Florian wrote:
> > Inject fake timestamps into the build via faketime to produce the exact
> > same binaries.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Florian Bäuerle
> > ---
> > platforms/barebo
Am Freitag, den 12.10.2018, 14:01 +0200 schrieb Michael Olbrich:
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 02:19:17PM +, Baeuerle, Florian wrote:
> > Inject fake timestamps into the build via faketime to produce the exact
> > same binaries.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Florian Bäuerle
> > ---
> > platforms/barebo
On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 02:19:17PM +, Baeuerle, Florian wrote:
> Inject fake timestamps into the build via faketime to produce the exact
> same binaries.
>
> Signed-off-by: Florian Bäuerle
> ---
> platforms/barebox.in | 10 ++
> rules/barebox.make | 16 +++-
> 2 files c
I tested this for phycore-am335x and phycard-imx27 bootloaders. I get the same
binaries from different machines, but I think anyone using that feature should
first test it before putting any trust into it.
This is a quick implementation that I primarily need for my RAUC bundles (for
not overwritin
Inject fake timestamps into the build via faketime to produce the exact
same binaries.
Signed-off-by: Florian Bäuerle
---
platforms/barebox.in | 10 ++
rules/barebox.make | 16 +++-
2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/platforms/barebox.in b/platfo
18 matches
Mail list logo