1. Apologies:
My apologies to Brian for asking a bad question at the “Hootenanny” live
web chat, but I got really excited to hear about how Web-Animations is
modeled after Core Animation. Fortunately the .animate() syntax does look
kind of usable, but I am still confused given all of the differen
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 6:54 AM, Shane Stephens wrote:
>
>> 4. Subtraction:
>>
>>
>> I propose the spec require a definition of subtraction for properties in
>> 4.1.2. Procedures for animating properties. I also propose the spec require
>> the definition of zero for properties. This is of course
https://developer.apple.com/library/mac/documentation/GraphicsImaging/Reference/CALayer_class/index.html#//apple_ref/occ/instm/CALayer/addAnimation:forKey
:
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 2:08 AM, Brian Birtles wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have a difficulty in Web Animations with regards to object lifetimes
> f
Of course the link doesn't work.
addAnimation:forKey:
On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 4:58 PM, Kevin Doughty wrote:
>
> https://developer.apple.com/library/mac/documentation/GraphicsImaging/Reference/CALayer_class/index.html#//apple_ref/occ/instm/CALayer/addAnimation:forKey
> :
>
>
element.animate(animation [, name]);
element.animate(effect, timing [, name]);
This would permit usage patterns that avoid your stated problems, and would
not break existing code. Just add a third argument. It would still be
possible to add forward filling animations with an undefined name. This
Why is there a distinction between CSS transitionProperty and CSS
animationName and script based animation id? Why are these three not one
and the same? I do want a way to access all animations vs. a single keyed
accessor. Something like getAnimations() and getAnimationNamed(). But how
about you le
aming” with values “exact”, “none”, and “increment”, but
I concede it is awkward. An alternate to allow multiple animations with the
same name, returned in an array, would be even worse.
On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Kevin Doughty wrote:
> Why is there a distinction between CSS transition
atever you
want to call it, maybe “smoothing” or “dampening”) is something that I’ve
suggested before. But that was a lost cause a long time ago.
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 2:38 AM, Brian Birtles wrote:
> Hi Kevin,
>
> Thanks for your mail.
>
> On 2015/11/25 13:52, Kevin Do
I would like to animate arbitrary properties of Javascript objects. I find
Houdini Properties and Values to be really compelling, and would like to be
able to trigger animations of non-CSS properties using something similar to
the apply function. I envision Object.defineProperty as a possible place
tationLayer(myObject);
On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 7:25 PM, Kevin Doughty wrote:
> I would like to animate arbitrary properties of Javascript objects. I find
> Houdini Properties and Values to be really compelling, and would like to be
> able to trigger animations of non-CSS properties
10 matches
Mail list logo
