Bernhard, All,
So, another take on how to deal with broken links: couple of days ago I
reported two broken links in a TAG finding [1] which was (quickly and
pragmatically, bravo, TG!) addressed [2], recently.
Let's abstract this away and apply to data rather than documents. The
mechanism could w
(Apology for cross posting)
Call for Statement of Interest
due: March 2, 2009
Social Semantic Web: Where Web 2.0 Meets Web 3.0
AAAI 2009 Spring Symposium series
23-25 March 2009, Stanford University
Problem: How do I find the URI of an Entity in DBpedia's data space?
You've already seen the solutions from Sindice and Georgi's DBpedia
Lookup service. Here is our solution, which is basically revisiting the
faceted "Search" and "Find" demo we put out a few weeks ago.
As per my earlier mai
All,
When I read the notice from Sebastian earlier today, re. the new
DBpedia & Wikipedia real-time variant, it dawned on me to use this new
DBpedia instance to demonstrate a fundamental feature of DBpedia
deployment. Basically, what I've referred to in prior commentary as a
"subtle nuanc
[Apologies for cross posting]
Dear all,
We are pleased to announce the first version of DBpedia-Live 0.x , a
DBpedia enhancement aimed at bringing the Wikipedia and DBpedia
Communities closer together.
Changes on Wikipedia are pulled over a Wikipedia Update Stream and
loaded into
our local
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Georgi Kobilarov
wrote:
> Try the terms "Shakespeare", "EU", or "Cambridge" and see for yourself
> if the results you'd expect show up at the top. The result ranking is
> different - and supposed to be more useful - than a simple full-text
> search or SPARQL-Query
*** FIRST ANNOUNCEMENT ***
THE SEVENTH EUROPEAN SUMMER SCHOOL ON ONTOLOGICAL ENGINEERING AND THE
SEMANTIC WEB (SSSW-2009)
5-11 July, 2009 Cercedilla, near Madrid, Spain.
http://sssw09.org
INTRODUCTION
We are pleased to announce the seventh European Summer School on
Ontological Engineering and
In message <49925bca.6010...@thefigtrees.net>, Lee Feigenbaum
writes
The SPARQL working group did produce a draft of a WSDL 1.1 definition
of the SPARQL protocol at one point:
http://www.w3.org/TR/sprot11/
However, I am not sure if the protocol defined in this WSDL 1.1
document is the sa
In message <49925bca.6010...@thefigtrees.net>, Lee Feigenbaum
writes
Hi Richard,
As best I can tell -- and it's been a long time since I've actively
worked with this stuff -- your tool is expecting a WSDL 1.1 file,
whereas the WSDL referenced in the SPARQL Protocol document is a WSDL
2.0 d
