Interesting discussion!
On 25/6/09 14:15, Simon Reinhardt wrote:
Hi
Bernhard Schandl wrote:
[1] http://www.ifs.univie.ac.at/schandl/2009/06/domain+range_bad.png
[2] http://www.ifs.univie.ac.at/schandl/2009/06/domain+range_better.png
I like this. The former has several problems anyway: you
Mark,
And everyone knows at least one way to publish HTML, don't they?
I disagree. Most people know how to enter text into a form, but they
have no clue what HTML is all about, how it comes that one line of
text is bigger while the other is smaller, how backlinks and
permalinks are
On 25 Jun 2009, at 21:18, Pat Hayes wrote:
If [RDF] requires people to tinker with files with names starting
with a dot [...] then the entire SWeb architecture is fundamentally
broken.
RDF doesn't. Apache does.
Many hosts do have front ends for configuring Apache, allowing
redirects to
On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 12:16:36 +0100, Toby Inkster t...@g5n.co.uk wrote:
What needs to be communicated is that:
[ a foaf:Agent ] foaf:holdsAccount [ a foaf:OnlineAccount ] .
instead. Those triples are not actually in the ontology itself, but will
be found (or at least implied) in any
I agree, with Bernard (and also with an earlier comment of Mark's): if
we are talking about widespread adoption of RDF, we need to think of
who is currently creating HTML, and how they are doing it. I think we
all know this, but it's easy to forget when we spend all our time on
the web or
On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 09:35 +0200, Dan Brickley wrote:
Does every major RDF toolkit have an integrated RDFa parser already?
No - and even for those that do, it's often rather flaky.
Seseme/Rio doesn't have one in its stable release, though I believe one
is in development for 3.0.
On 26/6/09 10:51, Toby Inkster wrote:
On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 09:35 +0200, Dan Brickley wrote:
Does every major RDF toolkit have an integrated RDFa parser already?
No - and even for those that do, it's often rather flaky.
Seseme/Rio doesn't have one in its stable release, though I believe one
Dan,
Yeah, my [4] is at my threshold of tolerance for chaos in a diagram.
I wanted a way to show the core of the FOAF spec in a picture, so
tried (despite similar concerns to those mentioned in this thread)
the style of putting domain/range directly in an instance-like style.
I think
Dan Brickley wrote:
+cc: Norm Walsh
On 25/6/09 19:39, Juan Sequeda wrote:
So... then from what I understand.. why bother with content negotiation,
right?
Just do everything in RDFa, right?
We are planning to deploy soon the linked data version of Turn2Live.com.
And we are in the discussion
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 6:44 PM, Martin Hepp
(UniBW)martin.h...@ebusiness-unibw.org wrote:
Hi all:
After about two months of helping people generate RDF/XML metadata for their
businesses using the GoodRelations annotator [1],
I have quite some evidence that the current best practices of using
Danny Ayers wrote:
2009/6/26 Aldo Bucchi aldo.buc...@gmail.com:
It baiscally answers this question: how do I put my spreadsheet/table
on the web?
use the column names as class descriptions, give the instances URIs.
what's the problem?
There are several common problems: (1) not all tables
Hi Toby,
Toby A Inkster wrote:
On 25 Jun 2009, at 21:18, Pat Hayes wrote:
If [RDF] requires people to tinker with files with names starting
with a dot [...] then the entire SWeb architecture is fundamentally
broken.
RDF doesn't. Apache does.
Many hosts do have front ends for configuring
On Jun 26, 2009, at 3:03 AM, Toby A Inkster wrote:
On 25 Jun 2009, at 21:18, Pat Hayes wrote:
If [RDF] requires people to tinker with files with names starting
with a dot [...] then the entire SWeb architecture is fundamentally
broken.
RDF doesn't. Apache does.
I should have said, if
Melvin Carvalho wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 6:44 PM, Martin Hepp
(UniBW)martin.h...@ebusiness-unibw.org wrote:
Hi all:
After about two months of helping people generate RDF/XML metadata for their
businesses using the GoodRelations annotator [1],
I have quite some evidence that the
(Apologies for multiple postings)
**
**
* Call for papers *
*
Hi Martin,
b) download RDFa snippet that just represents the RDF/XML content (i.e. such
that it does not have to be consolidated with the presentation level part
of the Web page.
By coincidence, I just read this:
Hidden div's -- don't do it!
It can be tempting to add all the content
Kingsley-
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Kingsley Idehenkide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
Mark: Should we be describing our docs for Google, fundamentally? I really
think Google should actually recalibrate back to the Web etc..
The correct question to ask, and the one that I believe Mark is
17 matches
Mail list logo
