Hey all,
I spy an article about
http://www.icmacentre.ac.uk/soldier/database/search.php on slashdot.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/8160081.stm
This database contains lots of records on Garrisons, Musters (call to
serve), etc
It occurs to me that this would be neat to interlink with
Freebase
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 9:22 PM, Pat Hayes wrote:
> Heres another example. Cyc lists all the chemical elements, and cross-links
> to other such lists in other ontologies using owl:sameAs. But the Cyc
> ontology says that an element is the set (class) of all pieces of the pure
> element, so that for
2009/7/22 Pat Hayes :
>
> On Jul 21, 2009, at 7:26 PM, Alan Ruttenberg wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Toby Inkster wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 19:52 +0300, Bernhard Schandl wrote:
>>>
> I would say: Never assert sameAs. It's just too big a hammer.
> Instead use a wide
Heres another example. Cyc lists all the chemical elements, and cross-
links to other such lists in other ontologies using owl:sameAs. But
the Cyc ontology says that an element is the set (class) of all pieces
of the pure element, so that for example sodium in Cyc has a member
which is the l
2009/7/22 Alan Ruttenberg :
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Toby Inkster wrote:
>> On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 19:52 +0300, Bernhard Schandl wrote:
>>
>>> > I would say: Never assert sameAs. It's just too big a hammer.
>>> > Instead use a wider palette of relationships to connect entities
>>> > to oth
On Jul 21, 2009, at 7:26 PM, Alan Ruttenberg wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Toby Inkster wrote:
On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 19:52 +0300, Bernhard Schandl wrote:
I would say: Never assert sameAs. It's just too big a hammer.
Instead use a wider palette of relationships to connect entities
t
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Toby Inkster wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 19:52 +0300, Bernhard Schandl wrote:
>
>> > I would say: Never assert sameAs. It's just too big a hammer.
>> > Instead use a wider palette of relationships to connect entities
>> > to other ones.
>>
>> which ones would you
Martin
well done,
I definitely think this work is in the right direction in terms of making
RDF usable
thanks a lot for the contribution
(how to bridge yahoo and google respective naming conventions is a good
question
and another issue entirely)
Sorry have not had the chance to try it myself, but
Dear all:
I just completed a recipe meant for larger audiences (Web developers,
SEO companies) on how a business can enrich its pages using
RDFa+GoodRelations so that the data
- shows up in Yahoo AND
- it at the same time useful for comprehensive RDF applications.
The recipe is at
http://tr.im/
On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 19:52 +0300, Bernhard Schandl wrote:
> > I would say: Never assert sameAs. It's just too big a hammer.
> > Instead use a wider palette of relationships to connect entities
> > to other ones.
>
> which ones would you recommend?
skos:exactMatch = asserts that the two resour
Hi Alan,
I would say: Never assert sameAs. It's just too big a hammer. Instead
use a wider palette of relationships to connect entities to other
ones.
which ones would you recommend?
Best, Bernhard
11 matches
Mail list logo