[Second Call] 1st Workshop on Mobile Social Semantic Web (in ASWC 2009)

2009-10-15 Thread Hak-Lae Kim
[We apologize in advance if you receive multiple copies of this message] === Call for Papers === 1st Workshop on Mobile Social Semantic Web (MSSW 2009)

Re: Mirror for PIPS food ontology?

2009-10-15 Thread Alan Ruttenberg
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 9:21 AM, Alan Ruttenberg wrote: > On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Alexander Garcia Castro > wrote: >> wayback similar to the time machine available in Mac would be great. as for >> imports, imports are just one type of mappings; > > An import isn't a mapping and more than

Re: Mirror for PIPS food ontology?

2009-10-15 Thread Alan Ruttenberg
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Alexander Garcia Castro wrote: > wayback similar to the time machine available in Mac would be great. as for > imports, imports are just one type of mappings; An import isn't a mapping and more than a type declaration is a mapping. > the situation will be more >

Re: Mirror for PIPS food ontology?

2009-10-15 Thread Alexander Garcia Castro
wayback similar to the time machine available in Mac would be great. as for imports, imports are just one type of mappings; the situation will be more complex as soon as people start to map across ontology repositories; Bioportal does not support mappings across ontologies sitting on diferent biopo

Re: Mirror for PIPS food ontology?

2009-10-15 Thread Alan Ruttenberg
What would be nice would be to have a wayback machine for ontologies. So I could go and get a particular version. Extra points if the imported ontologies were captured at the same time and pointers adjusted so that one could easily use an ontology as it was at a specific point in time. -Alan On

Re: Mirror for PIPS food ontology?

2009-10-15 Thread Giovanni Tummarello
Kind of make me thing.. we could put it virtually back in the same place as originally on our Sindice cache [1] i wonder if the operation make sense.. on the one hand a chace is usually intended for reflecting "reality" on the other i'd see obvious practical advantages. Maybe we could offer an "a