On 14 Nov 2009, at 12:44, Hugh Glaser wrote:
Anyone who can differentiate the two Lajos Hanzos in Mobile comms
(both of
whom have been in the same group at Southampton) deserves a medal,
and to
have the fruits of their labours recorded for posterity.
Mind you, for differentFrom to have any v
In message <4afebc7c.3060...@webr3.org>, Nathan
writes
Yeah, certainly worth investigating - an owl:differentFrom is also a
link after all. By definition it's likely to go to data that you don't
actually want, but probably the best way of dealing with that is
figure out what's needed to get it
On 14 Nov 2009, at 12:31, Simon Reinhardt
wrote:
> Richard Light wrote:
>> Hugh Glaser's sameAs.org site [1] provides a facility for finding
>> multiple URIs for the same concept. How about a site which does
>> the opposite: indicates where URIs refer to _different_ concepts?
>> Obviously, this
---
Apologies if you receive multiple copies of this message
---
Second call for papers for a
JWS special issue on Semantic Search
Yong Yu and Rudi Studer are editing a special issue of the Journal of We
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 2:10 PM, Thomas Bandholtz <
thomas.bandho...@innoq.com> wrote:
> One example:
> "bass [fish]" and "bass [music]", which are about "bass" as a homograph
> (not a homophone).
>
> You see I used some kind of "qualifier" to distinguish the two meanings.
> This is a common pract
Thomas and Karl- Thanks for the leads; this gives us something to run
with. To Karl's point, our principal concern is with homographs. Even
though the approach outlined introduces classes to deal with labels it
is perhaps the only principled way to do this type of thing, and at
least we won't have
Hi Bradley,
thanks a lot for raising this question, as currently we have discussions
about different approaches of Label management in SKOS(XL), and the
homograph issue has been somehow neglected so far.
Karl has mentioned the difference between homographs and homophones already.
I would say: hom
Danny Ayers wrote:
> 2009/11/14 Simon Reinhardt :
>
>> I definitely think it's useful for Linked Data purposes, just like
>> owl:sameAs, IFPs and everything that Allemand and Hendler describe as
>> RDFS-Plus (although they don't include owl:differentFrom in that).
>
> Yeah, certainly worth invest
2009/11/14 Simon Reinhardt :
> I definitely think it's useful for Linked Data purposes, just like
> owl:sameAs, IFPs and everything that Allemand and Hendler describe as
> RDFS-Plus (although they don't include owl:differentFrom in that).
Yeah, certainly worth investigating - an owl:differentFrom
Richard Light wrote:
Hugh Glaser's sameAs.org site [1] provides a facility for finding
multiple URIs for the same concept. How about a site which does the
opposite: indicates where URIs refer to _different_ concepts? Obviously,
this is only helpful where you might be tempted to assume that the
Thanks Richard, very thoughtful.
One day there might be:
http://differentfrom.org/
(John Goodwin suggested the site and redirect!)
More seriously.
Yes, differentFrom is really good information.
There is an owl:differentFrom (and owl:AllDifferent), but it is not used
much.
We used to have the faci
Le 12 nov. 2009 à 19:55, Bradley Allen a écrit :
is there any best practice or, failing that, good ideas for
representing
homonymy in SKOS?
homophone: same sound, different meaning
or homograph: same graph, different meaning
Maybe a better list is public-swd...@w3.org
The use case has
Hi,
Following on from the excellent Open Data and the Semantic Web meeting
at the London Knowledge Labs yesterday (thank you, Open Knowledge
Foundation), a thought occurs to me. I don't imagine it's a new one,
but I would be interested to know what has been done in this direction.
Hugh Gla
13 matches
Mail list logo
