On Mar/29/10 10:01 am, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
David Huynh wrote:
On Mar/29/10 12:31 am, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
All,
A very nice data cleansing tool from David and Co. at Freebase.
CSVs are clearly the dominant data format in the structured open
data realm. This tool deals with ETL very well.
David Huynh wrote:
On Mar/29/10 12:31 am, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
All,
A very nice data cleansing tool from David and Co. at Freebase.
CSVs are clearly the dominant data format in the structured open data
realm. This tool deals with ETL very well. Of course, for those who
appreciate OWL, a lo
On Mar/29/10 12:31 am, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
All,
A very nice data cleansing tool from David and Co. at Freebase.
CSVs are clearly the dominant data format in the structured open data
realm. This tool deals with ETL very well. Of course, for those who
appreciate OWL, a lot of what's demonstr
I think the answer is yes, but need to ponder.
(And I see Michael Smethurst is of this opinion.)
As people like Tom know, I've never much liked 303, but did it because I
think that fragmenting tiny communities doesn't help!
On the other hand, I find hash pretty ugly.
But perhaps not quite as ugly -
Leigh Dodds wrote:
Hi,
On Sunday, March 28, 2010, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
All,
A very nice data cleansing tool from David and Co. at Freebase.
Yes, it looks very nice. Am looking forward to working with it.
CSVs are clearly the dominant data format in the structured open data
re
Hi,
On Sunday, March 28, 2010, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
> All,
>
> A very nice data cleansing tool from David and Co. at Freebase.
Yes, it looks very nice. Am looking forward to working with it.
> CSVs are clearly the dominant data format in the structured open data
> realm. This tool deals with
All,
A very nice data cleansing tool from David and Co. at Freebase.
CSVs are clearly the dominant data format in the structured open data
realm. This tool deals with ETL very well. Of course, for those who
appreciate OWL, a lot of what's demonstrated in this demo is also
achievable via "cont
