CFP Special Issue of the Journal of Web Semantics on Semantic Web Dynamics

2010-05-18 Thread Mathieu D'Aquin
CALL FOR PAPERS Journal of Web Semantics Special Issue on Semantic Web Dynamics Description Recent years have witnessed the arrival of more and more semantically annotated data and related ontologies in the

CFP Special Issue of the Journal of Web Semantics on Semantic Web Dynamics

2010-05-18 Thread Mathieu D'Aquin
CALL FOR PAPERS Journal of Web Semantics Special Issue on Semantic Web Dynamics Description Recent years have witnessed the arrival of more and more semantically annotated data and related ontologies in the

HTTPS URI:s

2010-05-18 Thread Niklas Lindström
Hi all! Does there exist any advice regarding whether HTTPS URI:s constitute good identifiers (canonical URI:s)? Or is the HTTPS protocol an implementation detail better led to via redirection, HTTP Upgrade or similar? And would it be fair to claim that non-HTTPS URI:s are "potentially harmful" d

Re: Migrating from slash to fragment

2010-05-18 Thread KangHao Lu (Kenny)
On 2010/05/16, at 5:00, Nathan wrote: Toby Inkster wrote: On Fri, 14 May 2010 17:53:50 +0100 Nathan wrote: I'm wondering if there are any recommended paths for migrating RDF or specifically an ontology from slash to fragment URIs (?) Cool URIs don't change. Indeed. But several reasons we

Re: HTTPS URI:s

2010-05-18 Thread Nathan
Niklas Lindström wrote: Hi all! Does there exist any advice regarding whether HTTPS URI:s constitute good identifiers (canonical URI:s)? Or is the HTTPS protocol an implementation detail better led to via redirection, HTTP Upgrade or similar? And would it be fair to claim that non-HTTPS URI:s a

Re: Migrating from slash to fragment

2010-05-18 Thread Nathan
KangHao Lu (Kenny) wrote: On 2010/05/16, at 5:00, Nathan wrote: Toby Inkster wrote: On Fri, 14 May 2010 17:53:50 +0100 Nathan wrote: I'm wondering if there are any recommended paths for migrating RDF or specifically an ontology from slash to fragment URIs (?) Cool URIs don't change. Inde

Re: Migrating from slash to fragment

2010-05-18 Thread KangHao Lu (Kenny)
On 2010/05/18, at 19:52, Nathan wrote: KangHao Lu (Kenny) wrote: On 2010/05/16, at 5:00, Nathan wrote: Toby Inkster wrote: On Fri, 14 May 2010 17:53:50 +0100 Nathan wrote: I'm wondering if there are any recommended paths for migrating RDF or specifically an ontology from slash to fragment

Re: Migrating from slash to fragment

2010-05-18 Thread Nathan
KangHao Lu (Kenny) wrote: On 2010/05/18, at 19:52, Nathan wrote: KangHao Lu (Kenny) wrote: On 2010/05/16, at 5:00, Nathan wrote: Toby Inkster wrote: On Fri, 14 May 2010 17:53:50 +0100 Nathan wrote: I'm wondering if there are any recommended paths for migrating RDF or specifically an ontol

Re: Web Linking and @rev

2010-05-18 Thread Mark Nottingham
Realise that the Link draft doesn't forbid using rev, it just doesn't recommend it. You can still use the syntax. Also, Link has been approved by the IESG for publication as an RFC, so the document cannot be substantially changed now, without publishing another RFC. Cheers, On 17/05/2010, at

Re: Migrating from slash to fragment

2010-05-18 Thread KangHao Lu (Kenny)
+1 re confusing, I've taken to using both; redundant but I figure not everybody parsing the linked data have reasoners so good to put in something many understand. Yes, exactly! Please do not think Semantic Web is smart!! Or maybe I should spend some money to get a better reasoner. smime

Re: Migrating from slash to fragment

2010-05-18 Thread Kingsley Idehen
KangHao Lu (Kenny) wrote: +1 re confusing, I've taken to using both; redundant but I figure not everybody parsing the linked data have reasoners so good to put in something many understand. Yes, exactly! Please do not think Semantic Web is smart!! Or maybe I should spend some money to get a