CALL FOR PAPERS
Journal of Web Semantics
Special Issue on Semantic Web Dynamics
Description
Recent years have witnessed the arrival of more and more semantically
annotated data and related ontologies in the
CALL FOR PAPERS
Journal of Web Semantics
Special Issue on Semantic Web Dynamics
Description
Recent years have witnessed the arrival of more and more semantically
annotated data and related ontologies in the
Hi all!
Does there exist any advice regarding whether HTTPS URI:s constitute
good identifiers (canonical URI:s)? Or is the HTTPS protocol an
implementation detail better led to via redirection, HTTP Upgrade or
similar?
And would it be fair to claim that non-HTTPS URI:s are "potentially
harmful" d
On 2010/05/16, at 5:00, Nathan wrote:
Toby Inkster wrote:
On Fri, 14 May 2010 17:53:50 +0100
Nathan wrote:
I'm wondering if there are any recommended paths for migrating RDF
or specifically an ontology from slash to fragment URIs (?)
Cool URIs don't change.
Indeed. But several reasons we
Niklas Lindström wrote:
Hi all!
Does there exist any advice regarding whether HTTPS URI:s constitute
good identifiers (canonical URI:s)? Or is the HTTPS protocol an
implementation detail better led to via redirection, HTTP Upgrade or
similar?
And would it be fair to claim that non-HTTPS URI:s a
KangHao Lu (Kenny) wrote:
On 2010/05/16, at 5:00, Nathan wrote:
Toby Inkster wrote:
On Fri, 14 May 2010 17:53:50 +0100
Nathan wrote:
I'm wondering if there are any recommended paths for migrating RDF
or specifically an ontology from slash to fragment URIs (?)
Cool URIs don't change.
Inde
On 2010/05/18, at 19:52, Nathan wrote:
KangHao Lu (Kenny) wrote:
On 2010/05/16, at 5:00, Nathan wrote:
Toby Inkster wrote:
On Fri, 14 May 2010 17:53:50 +0100
Nathan wrote:
I'm wondering if there are any recommended paths for migrating
RDF or specifically an ontology from slash to fragment
KangHao Lu (Kenny) wrote:
On 2010/05/18, at 19:52, Nathan wrote:
KangHao Lu (Kenny) wrote:
On 2010/05/16, at 5:00, Nathan wrote:
Toby Inkster wrote:
On Fri, 14 May 2010 17:53:50 +0100
Nathan wrote:
I'm wondering if there are any recommended paths for migrating RDF
or specifically an ontol
Realise that the Link draft doesn't forbid using rev, it just doesn't recommend
it. You can still use the syntax.
Also, Link has been approved by the IESG for publication as an RFC, so the
document cannot be substantially changed now, without publishing another RFC.
Cheers,
On 17/05/2010, at
+1 re confusing, I've taken to using both; redundant but I figure
not everybody parsing the linked data have reasoners so good to put
in something many understand.
Yes, exactly! Please do not think Semantic Web is smart!! Or maybe I
should spend some money to get a better reasoner.
smime
KangHao Lu (Kenny) wrote:
+1 re confusing, I've taken to using both; redundant but I figure not
everybody parsing the linked data have reasoners so good to put in
something many understand.
Yes, exactly! Please do not think Semantic Web is smart!! Or maybe I
should spend some money to get a
11 matches
Mail list logo