>
> this is a data set i really want too somebody know a way around
> the unicode problem???
>
> Maybe find stuff like these "ï" with a regexp and then replace
them with the correct unicode chars.
In Python something like this looped through each line of the files should
work I think:
impor
Hellos
> The main major thing lacking now I think is links[1] to MusicBrainz, and I
> don't think that can be done without a dump. Apart from that, the mappings
> are also incomplete. The ruby code can be found at dataincubator[2].
but plz note the UTF-8 problems in the underlying dump as discuss
On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 12:41 -0400, Bob DuCharme wrote:
> Dave,
>
> Does this mean that no sample data has been created yet, or that
> samples used in the course of development are not data that you are
> free to share?
Given the rather ... short ... timescale we were working under the
sketchy ex
The main major thing lacking now I think is links[1] to MusicBrainz, and I
don't think that can be done without a dump. Apart from that, the mappings
are also incomplete. The ruby code can be found at dataincubator[2].
1.
http://blog.dbtune.org/post/2007/06/11/Linking-open-data%3A-interlinking-the
Hello,
>> Does anyone know the state of play wrt a linked dataset describing Discogs
>> (the music/record site)?
I've spent some time w/ Discogs stuff - it needs some work. The links
to DBpedia are broken b/c of some capitalization errors, and the
artist URIs and foaf:names are a bit borked b/c
Dave,
Does this mean that no sample data has been created yet, or that samples
used in the course of development are not data that you are free to share?
thanks,
Bob
Dave Reynolds wrote:
On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 09:29 -0400, Bob DuCharme wrote:
Is any sample instance data available, whether
Weren't these details of the discussion the sort of "Mission Creep" the org
vocabulary meant to avoid ? Certainly NGO's including Commercial Interests
would like nothing better than to ride the trustworthiness coattails of a
Geo-Political State. But the State is trustworthy precisely because i
On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 14:07 +0100, William Waites wrote:
> On 10-06-03 09:01, Dan Brickley wrote:
> > I don't find anything particularly troublesome about the org: vocab on
> > this front. If you really want to critique culturally-loaded
> > ontologies, I'd go find one that declares class hierarchi
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 3:07 PM, William Waites wrote:
> On 10-06-03 09:01, Dan Brickley wrote:
>> I don't find anything particularly troublesome about the org: vocab on
>> this front. If you really want to critique culturally-loaded
>> ontologies, I'd go find one that declares class hierarchies wi
On 6/3/10 7:07 AM, Matthew Rowe wrote:
Does anyone know the state of play wrt a linked dataset describing
Discogs (the music/record site)?
There have always been Virtuoso Sponger [1] Cartridges (Basic and Meta)
for Discogs.
Examples:
1.
http://linkeddata.uriburner.com/about/id/entity/http
On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 09:29 -0400, Bob DuCharme wrote:
> Is any sample instance data available, whether it's using real or fake
> organizations?
Not yet, but there will be.
Dave
Is any sample instance data available, whether it's using real or fake
organizations?
thanks,
Bob
On 10-06-03 09:01, Dan Brickley wrote:
> I don't find anything particularly troublesome about the org: vocab on
> this front. If you really want to critique culturally-loaded
> ontologies, I'd go find one that declares class hierarchies with terms
> like 'Terrorist' without giving any operational d
Does anyone know the state of play wrt a linked dataset describing
Discogs (the music/record site)?
I know that Leigh Dodds did some work about a year ago [1] but it
appears that the data incubator page for the dataset is not active.
There is also a SPARQL endpoint to the data at [2] but no
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Stuart A. Yeates wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 8:09 PM, Dave Reynolds
> wrote:
>> On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 17:06 +1200, Stuart A. Yeates wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Dave Reynolds
>>> wrote:
>>> > We would like to announce the availability of an ontol
2010/6/3 Haijie.Peng :
> [Apologies for cross-posting]
>
> Why should we publish ordered collections or indexes as RDF? is it necessary?
On the Web, very little is 'necessary'. But some things can be useful.
Indexes and summaries can help software prioritise, and allow larger
files to be loaded on
16 matches
Mail list logo
