On 15 June 2010 07:09, Stuart A. Yeates wrote:
> On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 6:43 PM, Nathan wrote:
>> Thus, do we currently have, or can we find a single, simple way to express
>> that document X contains further information for subject Y that primarily
>> uses the predicate Z.
>
> I'm not certain,
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 6:43 PM, Nathan wrote:
> Thus, do we currently have, or can we find a single, simple way to express
> that document X contains further information for subject Y that primarily
> uses the predicate Z.
I'm not certain, but I'm pretty sure that this should be: "document X
con
Hi Søren,
People will correct me if I am wrong but I think that rdf:Bag causes
problems with SPARQL queries, but I like what you are suggesting and it may
be that there is some other way to get this goal
achieved. In the RDF example, I think I have the geonames URI for the
Country "US". This then
In most Organizations, Rank Has It's Privileges (RHIP) and this affects Access
to and Disclosure of data. Government Policies present some unique Access
challenges.
These include, from a LOD perspective, that "Disclosure" is another
Organization's Access. For Governments there is a clear distin
Hi,
I do not really understand the need for rdfs:Class:
owl:Class is already defined with rdfs:subClassOf rdfs:Class (same thing
for the properties). So its is a transitivity issue and it depends on
the used reasoner to resolve that issue.
owl:Class is defined as a subclass of rdfs:Class *in
Le 14/06/2010 15:26, Bob Ferris a écrit :
Hi Antoine,
Hi Kurt,
Hi at all from the different lists,
Am 13.06.2010 22:13, schrieb Kurt J:
Hi Antoine,
[...skip...]
=
2) owl:Class VS rdfs:Class; owl:*Property VS rdf:Property
=
All your classes and properties are declared using the OWL v
Coming back to this one,
from: http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html
section: Limitations on browseable data
"""
One pattern is to have links of a certain property in a separate
document. A person's homepage doesn't list all their publications, but
instead puts a link to it a separate
Hi Antoine,
Hi Kurt,
Hi at all from the different lists,
Am 13.06.2010 22:13, schrieb Kurt J:
Hi Antoine,
I'm very glad to have you review my ontology - apparently it had some
significant problems!
I have some comments on your ontology:
1) related to OWL DL
2) related to the use of owl:C
(apologies for multiple postings)
Hi all,
The AKSW research group [1] is pleased to announce that OntoWiki 0.9.5 is
now available for download.
OntoWiki is a web-application enabling the collaborative creation and
(linked data) publication of RDF knowledge bases.
More information about Ont
I doubt that encoding the geospatial extent into the URI is a good idea. It
would be preferable to add a bounding box property to existing resources. If
you go to Wisconsin in GeoNames
(http://linkeddata.uriburner.com/about/html/http/sws.geonames.org/5279468/)
you'll see a "geo:geometry" proper
==
CALL FOR PAPERS
==
1st International Workshop on Consuming Linked Data (COLD 2010)
http://consuminglinkeddata.org/COLD2010
at the 9th International Semantic Web Conference
http://iswc2010.semanticweb.org
November 8, 2010, in Shangha
A blog post by Rod Page about a month ago has lots of interesting bits
of information regarding this:
http://iphylo.blogspot.com/2010/05/referring-to-one-degree-square-in-rdf.html
Also see Geohash:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geohash
-hilmar
On Jun 11, 2010, at 11:20 AM, Peter DeVri
Knocked up a little demo using the BBC Linked Data and DBpedia:
http://www.johngoodwin.me.uk/mashups/6radio.html
Filter by artist, genre or brand to find BBC 6music shows that play your
favourite tunes. Click on the dates to get more info.
John
Dr John Goodwin
Research Scientist, Research
13 matches
Mail list logo
