On 10-06-23 23:31, Toby Inkster wrote:
> Firstly, bridges and beaches are not typically considered organisations.
>
Sentient, self-organised bridges and beaches? On second
thought maybe they should be foaf:Person
-w
--
William Waites
Mob: +44 789 798 9965Open Knowledge Foundat
I like this:
"The sloping shore along a body of water that is washed by waves or tides and is
usually covered by sand or gravel (coast, shore, strand)."
Michael A. Norton
From: Gannon Dick
To: "egov...@w3.org" ; Linked Data community
S
I wonder whether they tried to process it using an RDF tool, because
it doesn't do what it looks like. DBpedia uses the prefix
http://dbpedia.org/resource/ for URIs, and it is not clear that
DBpedia resources actually map directly to classes anyway.
I think you need to go over some examples of how
'Strange' is probably the nicest thing Government Work has ever been called :)
The Public Domain is not undeveloped territory, it is a domain sovereign's 'set
aside' for sharing. I think that ignoring this will handicap the Semantic Web
and might do worse.
There are some details I wonder about:
On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 14:52:29 -0700 (PDT)
Gannon Dick wrote:
> An RDF/XML example for each type is below
These examples are strange.
Firstly, bridges and beaches are not typically considered organisations.
Secondly, you appear to be using some of the classes defined by the org
vocabulary as if
The Feature Class Definition page of the USGS (GNIS) search [1] provides a nice
example for the "Government Work" subclass of the Organization Name Space.
The Mash-up (Class Definitions) is composed of Natural and Man Made (under
human control) types.
An RDF/XML example for each type is below:
Here's how you specific your language preferences in Chrome:
* In the "Customize" menu (the wrench) select "Options"
* Select the "Under the Hood" tab
* Scroll down-down-down to "Web Content" area
* Select "Change font and language settings"
* Select the "Language" tab
* Add the languages of your
Hi Michael,
...does anyone know of any real world sites that content negotiate on
language accept headers? Yves has pointed out that Google search
does do
this so if I request google.co.uk with german set above english in my
browser preferences it serves a page at co.uk in german. But I'm no
Michael,
(sorry for the last post, hit accidentally the send button ;)
The best overview I'm aware of is a W3C QA blog post [1], contains also some
valuable pointers - hope that helps.
Cheers,
Michael
[1] http://www.w3.org/QA/2006/02/content_negotiation.html
--
Dr. Michael Hausenblas
L
Michael,
Cheers,
Michael
[1] http://www.w3.org/QA/2006/02/content_negotiation.html
--
Dr. Michael Hausenblas
LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
Ireland, Europe
Tel. +353 91 495730
http://linkedda
Hello
Realise this is slightly off topic for this list but since you people know
the most about content negotiation of the people I know I thought I'd try
here first. So...
...does anyone know of any real world sites that content negotiate on
language accept headers? Yves has pointed out that Goo
11 matches
Mail list logo
