Re: The Counter Ontology

2010-07-20 Thread Vasiliy Faronov
Sorry Bob, I was reading the RDFS spec in a completely wrong way, as it says clearly[1]: "A typed literal is an instance of a datatype class." So you're doing it all right, then. My initial point was merely about putting rdf:value to better use, but I understand your desire to have a special

Are there wikipedia stats as Linked Data?

2010-07-20 Thread Jörn Hees
Hello everyone, I'm searching for a nice way to get a list of the DBpedia instances corresponding to the Top1000 (visited) Wikipedia pages of either the last year or month. Is anyone aware of a Linked Data version of http://stats.grok.se/en/top , or a SPARQL endpoint I could query instead of p

Re: The Counter Ontology

2010-07-20 Thread Bob Ferris
Hi Vasiliy, Am 20.07.2010 15:50, schrieb Vasiliy Faronov: Bob Ferris wrote: How can I make sure that the value of my counter concept is of the type xsd:Integer? I think with the current definition: co:count rdf:type rdf:Property , owl:FunctionalProperty ; rdfs:comment "Links a

Re: The Counter Ontology

2010-07-20 Thread Vasiliy Faronov
Bob Ferris wrote: > How can I make sure that the value of my counter concept is of the type > xsd:Integer? I think with the current definition: > > co:count >rdf:type rdf:Property , owl:FunctionalProperty ; >rdfs:comment "Links a counter resource to the actual count"@en ; >

Re: The Counter Ontology

2010-07-20 Thread Bob Ferris
Hi Vasiliy, Am 20.07.2010 14:39, schrieb Vasiliy Faronov: Bob Ferris wrote: The second property of co:Counter is co:count, which is a simple xsd:int based datatype property. Any reasons for not using rdf:value[1]? Not that it would make a lot of difference, but seems like this property was

Re: The Counter Ontology

2010-07-20 Thread Vasiliy Faronov
Bob Ferris wrote: > The second property of co:Counter is co:count, which is a simple > xsd:int based datatype property. Any reasons for not using rdf:value[1]? Not that it would make a lot of difference, but seems like this property was made exactly for such statements. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/

Re: [ANN] RDFa Developer (1.0b1): RDFa extension for firefox

2010-07-20 Thread Melvin Carvalho
2010/7/13 Javier Pozueco Pérez > (sorry for cross posting) > > We are glad to announce the first public release of RDFa Developer, a > firefox extension that helps you to correctly annotate web pages with RDFa. > > This tool enables you to examine the RDFa markup, to query your data using > SPARQ

Re: Metaweb joins Google

2010-07-20 Thread Melvin Carvalho
On 20 July 2010 11:40, Hondros, Constantine < constantine.hond...@wolterskluwer.com> wrote: > It's big news for the wider Semantic Web community, as it shows that Google > is determined to extract better semantics from pages it crawls ... but it's > mediocre news for the LOD community. Freebase is

Re: [ANN] RDFa Developer (1.0b1): RDFa extension for firefox

2010-07-20 Thread Olivier Berger
Hi. Le mardi 13 juillet 2010 à 09:46 +0200, Javier Pozueco Pérez a écrit : > (sorry for cross posting) > > We are glad to announce the first public release of RDFa Developer, a > firefox extension that helps you to correctly annotate web pages with > RDFa. > > This tool enables you to examine t

Re: Poisonous models (was the bad word)

2010-07-20 Thread Renaud Delbru
Hi Hugh, comment below, On 19/07/10 08:22, Hugh Glaser wrote: to answer to your question, Sindice will accept the document, perform reasoning and index it as it is. However, Sindice is somehow robust to this kind of "poisonous" data. Sindice is performing a particular kind of reasoning that we

RE: Metaweb joins Google

2010-07-20 Thread Hondros, Constantine
It's big news for the wider Semantic Web community, as it shows that Google is determined to extract better semantics from pages it crawls ... but it's mediocre news for the LOD community. Freebase is based on proprietary database technology, it relies on its own graph data format, is queryable