Sorry I made a type : please read: I think a datatype should NOT only be
restricted to XML schema.
Using xsd:simpleType would discard the case of using XML Literal (for
example a GML encoded Geometry). Literal seems to be a safer bet.
I wish to see in a future version of RDF, a mechanism to valid
Using xsd:simpleType would discard the case of using XML Literal (for
example a GML encoded Geometry). Literal seems to be a safer bet.
I wish to see in a future version of RDF, a mechanism to valid XML literal
with an XML schema complex type or element.
I think a datatype should only be restricted
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Martin Hepp
wrote:
> NB:
>
> It seems that OWL 2 supports
>
> DataUnionOf( xsd:float xsd:decimal )
>
> The question is how broadly current apps and repositories already support
> OWL 2, in particular "at Web scale", outside of small, controlled
> environments.
Wha
NB:
It seems that OWL 2 supports
DataUnionOf( xsd:float xsd:decimal )
The question is how broadly current apps and repositories already
support OWL 2, in particular "at Web scale", outside of small,
controlled environments.
So I guess rdfs:Literal is the better choice for the moment.
Mar
Hi all:
Thanks! So I understand that for an owl:DatatypeProperty that may hold
xsd:float, xsd:integer, xsd:int, xsd:double, or xsd:decimal values,
the simplest solution is rdfs:Literal.
Is that correct?
xsd:decimal would include xsd:integer and xsd:int (?), but there is no
standard dataty
I looked on the site and did not find a legend for the color coding --
I'm probably overlooking it. Can someone post that link, for those of
us who can't find it?
Thanks,
kc
Quoting Antoine Isaac :
Anja, Richard, (ccing the Library Linked Data list)
Really great work! Adding to Rinke's co
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 8:25 AM, Martin Hepp
wrote:
> Dear all:
>
> Are there any theoretical or practical problems caused by defining the range
> of an owl:DatatypeProperty as
>
> http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#anySimpleType
>
> or
>
> http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#Literal
rdfs:Litera
Dear all,
this is a reminder that the submission deadline for the Semantic Web
Challenge 2010 is quickly approaching. The submission deadline is
Next Friday, October 1st, 2010, 12 a.m. (midnight) CET
The Semantic Web Challenge 2010 is collocated with the 9th International
Semantic Web Conference
Hi.
On 23/09/2010 06:21, "Egon Willighagen" wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Richard Cyganiak
> wrote:
>> On 22 Sep 2010, at 20:41, Egon Willighagen wrote:
>> If you want to see ChEMBL in the next issue, better get started on those
>> links ;-)
>
> I am on the road right now, but th
Martin Hepp wrote:
Dear all:
Are there any theoretical or practical problems caused by defining the
range of an owl:DatatypeProperty as
http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#anySimpleType
RDF Semantics has a good discussion on this at:
http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-mt/#dtype_interp
note that:
"Th
Dear all:
Are there any theoretical or practical problems caused by defining the
range of an owl:DatatypeProperty as
http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#anySimpleType
or
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#Literal
?
I think both should be valid (and are useful) in OWL DL ontologies,
but
Dear all
We are pleased to announce sitemap4rdf [1], a command-line tool that
generates sitemap.xml files, that follow the sitemap protocol [2], for
Linked Data sites that have a SPARQL endpoint.
The Sitemap protocol is supported by the major search engines to ensure
quick and complete indexin
I believe the coloring is based on the value of the CKAN "topic," as
discussed here:
http://esw.w3.org/TaskForces/CommunityProjects/LinkingOpenData/DataSets/CKANmetainformation
So, one of:
* media
* geographic
* lifesciences
* publications (including library and museum data)
* government
* ecomme
Hi,
is there a legend to the coloured cloud, which explains a bit the
coloured clusters, or did I simply missed it? (it would be nice, if this
legend is directly included in the graphic)
Cheers,
Bob
Am 23.09.2010 10:09, schrieb Antoine Isaac:
Anja, Richard, (ccing the Library Linked Data l
Anja, Richard, (ccing the Library Linked Data list)
Really great work! Adding to Rinke's comment, I'm also happily surprised by the coherence that you still can
give to the various parts of the LOD cloud: the colored version is really fascinating to see [1]. Our core
"library linked data" core
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
> On 22 Sep 2010, at 20:41, Egon Willighagen wrote:
> If you want to see ChEMBL in the next issue, better get started on those
> links ;-)
I am on the road right now, but there is low hanging fruit... however,
at the same time, I need to u
Dear Anja and Richard,
Excellent work! It's amazing how this thing keeps growing.
Cheers,
Rinke
On 22 sep 2010, at 20:50, Anja Jentzsch wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> thanks for all your input and the support on migrating the data set
> information to CKAN!
>
> The LOD Cloud as of September 2010 is f
17 matches
Mail list logo
