On 11/11/10 5:53 PM, John F. Sowa wrote:
Kingley, Alan, Doug, Chris, et al.,
John,
Thanks!
Just copying in LOD mailing list since I made a cc. mistake when
starting this thread :-)
KI:
... maybe we could use this thread to arrive at obvious common
ground re. data integration and the dim
On 11/10/10 4:21 PM, David Huynh wrote:
Hi all,
We've just released Google Refine 2.0, formerly called Freebase
Gridworks, and since Gridworks has previously been used to generate
linked data, I thought you might be interested in the 2.0 release:
http://google-opensource.blogspot.com/2010/1
We've just released Google Refine 2.0, formerly called Freebase
Gridworks, and since Gridworks has previously been used to generate
linked data, I thought you might be interested in the 2.0 release:
http://google-opensource.blogspot.com/2010/11/announcing-google-refine-20-power-tool.html
Best,
On 11/10/10 1:30 PM, Christopher Menzel wrote:
On Nov 10, 2010, at 12:16 PM, Alan Ruttenberg wrote:
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Kingsley Idehen
wrote:
Alan / John: maybe we could use this thread to arrive at obvious common
ground re. data integration and the diminishing need for a synt
*** On Nov 5, 2010, at 7:54 PM, Christian Rivas
wrote:
>> > you are absolutely right but what happen if I need to reuse
>> > a ontology term that belong to a different Domain
>> > as I exemplify before?
>> >
>> > Should I map Actor with foaf:Person and vcard:VCard and
>> > dbpedia:Actor classes
Thanks, John! I'm glad you're finding my work useful in this domain! I
try my best to keep my work as generic, open, and extensible as
possible.
David
Quoting "John Sheridan" :
David,
Thank you for this. Google Refine is a really important tool for the
Linked Data work we are doing on dat
/agree with Tore. I know it's an old debate, but it's payback time for
flooding my inbox for the last week.
Can someone please give me a good use case for pedantically
disambiguating an IR and NIR? This week I've seen the following samples:
"/toucan.rdf is wrong". Why are you declaring a d
On 11/11/10 2:01 PM, Pat Hayes wrote:
On Nov 11, 2010, at 8:42 AM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
On 11/11/10 9:00 AM, David Booth wrote:
On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 07:23 +0100, Jiří Procházka wrote:
[ . . . ]
I think it is flawed trying to enforce "URI == 1 thing"
Exactly right. The "URI == 1 thing" no
On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 13:19 -0500, dfhu...@csail.mit.edu wrote:
> Google Refine has an extension architecture that Fadi Maali and
> Richard Cyganiak have used to add RDF functionalities
>
> http://lab.linkeddata.deri.ie/2010/dcat/
>
I have played with these a bit too. Again, very important and
David,
Thank you for this. Google Refine is a really important tool for the
Linked Data work we are doing on data.gov.uk and becoming ever more
important.
Version 2.0 is looking good. I greatly value the work you are doing to
improve this vital tool, for the web of data.
Thanks again!
John.
On
On Nov 11, 2010, at 8:42 AM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
> On 11/11/10 9:00 AM, David Booth wrote:
>> On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 07:23 +0100, Jiří Procházka wrote:
>> [ . . . ]
>>> I think it is flawed trying to enforce "URI == 1 thing"
>> Exactly right. The "URI == 1 thing" notion is myth #1 in "Resource
On Nov 11, 2010, at 8:00 AM, David Booth wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 07:23 +0100, Jiří Procházka wrote:
> [ . . . ]
>> I think it is flawed trying to enforce "URI == 1 thing"
>
> Exactly right. The "URI == 1 thing" notion is myth #1 in "Resource
> Identity and Semantic Extensions: Making Se
On 11/11/10 1:19 PM, dfhu...@csail.mit.edu wrote:
Google Refine has an extension architecture that Fadi Maali and
Richard Cyganiak have used to add RDF functionalities
Yes, I am aware of that. So safe to assume that this extension will
inherit the new functionality associated with this update et
Google Refine has an extension architecture that Fadi Maali and
Richard Cyganiak have used to add RDF functionalities
http://lab.linkeddata.deri.ie/2010/dcat/
RDF stuff is best left to RDF experts :)
But really, Kingsley, please spend some time watching those
screencasts. There are one or t
On 11/11/10 12:52 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
All,
Type fixes
As the conversation about HTTP responses evolves, I am inclined to
believe that most still believe that:
1. URL is equivalent to a URI
2. URI is a fancier term for URI
3. URI is equivalent to URL.
1. URL is equivalent to a URI
All,
As the conversation about HTTP responses evolves, I am inclined to
believe that most still believe that:
1. URL is equivalent to a URI
2. URI is a fancier term for URI
3. URI is equivalent to URL.
I think my opinion on this matter is clear, but I am very interested in
the views of anyon
Didn't they make a film called "The Descriptor!" out of that?
Kingsley Idehen wrote:
I am the Data Container, Disseminator, and Canvas.
I came to be when the cognitive skills of mankind deemed oral history
inadequate.
I am transcendent, I take many forms, but my core purpose is constant -
Con
I am the Data Container, Disseminator, and Canvas.
I came to be when the cognitive skills of mankind deemed oral history
inadequate.
I am transcendent, I take many forms, but my core purpose is constant -
Container, Disseminator, and Canvas.
I am dexterous, I can be blank, partitioned horizonta
On 11/11/10 11:34 AM, Nathan wrote:
Kingsley Idehen wrote:
On 11/11/10 10:00 AM, Nathan wrote:
Kingsley Idehen wrote:
On 11/11/10 9:00 AM, David Booth wrote:
On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 07:23 +0100, Jiří Procházka wrote:
[ . . . ]
I think it is flawed trying to enforce "URI == 1 thing"
Exactly ri
Kingsley Idehen wrote:
On 11/11/10 10:00 AM, Nathan wrote:
Kingsley Idehen wrote:
On 11/11/10 9:00 AM, David Booth wrote:
On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 07:23 +0100, Jiří Procházka wrote:
[ . . . ]
I think it is flawed trying to enforce "URI == 1 thing"
Exactly right. The "URI == 1 thing" notion is
On 11/11/10 11:04 AM, David Huynh wrote:
[This didn't go through the first time.]
On Nov/10/10 4:21 pm, David Huynh wrote:
Hi all,
We've just released Google Refine 2.0, formerly called Freebase
Gridworks, and since Gridworks has previously been used to generate
linked data, I thought you
[This didn't go through the first time.]
On Nov/10/10 4:21 pm, David Huynh wrote:
Hi all,
We've just released Google Refine 2.0, formerly called Freebase
Gridworks, and since Gridworks has previously been used to generate
linked data, I thought you might be interested in the 2.0 release:
On 11/11/10 10:00 AM, Nathan wrote:
Kingsley Idehen wrote:
On 11/11/10 9:00 AM, David Booth wrote:
On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 07:23 +0100, Jiří Procházka wrote:
[ . . . ]
I think it is flawed trying to enforce "URI == 1 thing"
Exactly right. The "URI == 1 thing" notion is myth #1 in "Resource
Ide
I agree with Kingsley, an "identifier" that "identifies" more than one
thing is a common name, not an identifier.
To say that a URI can identify multiple things is as meaningless as
saying that the string "Rob" identifies me.
That is all. Carry on.
Rob Sanderson
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 7:42 AM,
On Nov 11, 2010, at 10:05, Nathan wrote:
> reality distortion is needed.
Heh. +1.
Regards,
Dave
Harry Halpin wrote:
The question is how to build Linked Data on top of *only* HTTP 200 -
the case where the data publisher either cannot alter their server
set-up (.htaccess) files or does not care to.
(1) use fragments
(2) if using slashes, admit "I was wrong" and migrate data (REAL uris do
c
Kingsley Idehen wrote:
On 11/11/10 9:00 AM, David Booth wrote:
On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 07:23 +0100, Jiří Procházka wrote:
[ . . . ]
I think it is flawed trying to enforce "URI == 1 thing"
Exactly right. The "URI == 1 thing" notion is myth #1 in "Resource
Identity and Semantic Extensions: Making
On 11/11/10 9:00 AM, David Booth wrote:
On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 07:23 +0100, Jiří Procházka wrote:
[ . . . ]
I think it is flawed trying to enforce "URI == 1 thing"
Exactly right. The "URI == 1 thing" notion is myth #1 in "Resource
Identity and Semantic Extensions: Making Sense of Ambiguity":
ht
David Booth wrote:
On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 07:23 +0100, Jiří Procházka wrote:
[ . . . ]
I think it is flawed trying to enforce "URI == 1 thing"
Exactly right. The "URI == 1 thing" notion is myth #1 in "Resource
Identity and Semantic Extensions: Making Sense of Ambiguity":
http://dbooth.org/2010
On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 07:23 +0100, Jiří Procházka wrote:
[ . . . ]
> I think it is flawed trying to enforce "URI == 1 thing"
Exactly right. The "URI == 1 thing" notion is myth #1 in "Resource
Identity and Semantic Extensions: Making Sense of Ambiguity":
http://dbooth.org/2010/ambiguity/paper.htm
On 11/11/10 8:07 AM, David Wood wrote:
On Nov 11, 2010, at 07:44, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
On 11/11/10 4:54 AM, Richard Light wrote:
In message
,
Harry Halpin writes
The question is how to build Linked Data on top of *only* HTTP 200 -
the case where the data publisher either cannot alter th
On Nov 11, 2010, at 07:44, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
> On 11/11/10 4:54 AM, Richard Light wrote:
>>
>> In message ,
>> Harry Halpin writes
>>>
>>> The question is how to build Linked Data on top of *only* HTTP 200 -
>>> the case where the data publisher either cannot alter their server
>>> se
On 11/11/10 4:54 AM, Richard Light wrote:
In message
, Harry
Halpin writes
The question is how to build Linked Data on top of *only* HTTP 200 -
the case where the data publisher either cannot alter their server
set-up (.htaccess) files or does not care to.
Might it help to look at this prob
In message
, Harry
Halpin writes
The question is how to build Linked Data on top of *only* HTTP 200 -
the case where the data publisher either cannot alter their server
set-up (.htaccess) files or does not care to.
Might it help to look at this problem from the other end of the
telescope? S
***
* SAMT 2010 - CALL FOR PARTICIPATION*
*5th International Conference on *
*Semantic And digital Media Technologies *
*Saarbrücken, Germany, 1-3 Decembe
35 matches
Mail list logo
